>The rarely granted intervention permits the judge to exercise discretion to avoid extreme and unreasonable jury decisions.[citation needed] In civil cases in U.S. federal court, the term was replaced in 1991 by the renewed judgment as a matter of law, which emphasizes its relationship to the judgment as a matter of law, formerly called a directed verdict.[1]
Remember, this was changed in 1991 and is actually unconstitutional because now Judges have way too much power, regardless if jurors get it wrong. It aborts and abridges "Due Process'; and a right to a fair trail because it negates a jury by thwarting any of it's decisions at a judges leisure. This 6th amendment violation of abuse in essence gives a judge full control to become a tyrant at will "Judge, Juror, and Executioner". Because any decisions have executive power as their result, therefor when a judge thwarts a jury and assume the decision process by passing judgement without regards to verdict it negates due process of the law, comes to a decision that has an execution as a result. Thus the judge has become all three "Judge, Juror, and Executioner". If he wasn't the executioner then anything that was passed by that judge that negates verdicts or jurors will not be executed by any and and all law enforcement agents; who powers are derived from the executive branch of government, right? Of course Law agencies will act upon any court order, therefor the judge is the actual executioner because it was his sole order, where the cops will just claim, I am just doin my job and not defend civil rights nor the constitution.
Time to end this shit show.
branch