>The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook
NGL I liked BO's attitude toward Israel
fuck em all!
who cares!
Gen Flynn's co-writer
https://rumble.com/v3r9xdp-mel-k-and-boone-cutler-understanding-and-defeating-the-enemy-in-the-5g-war-.html
THE STAR OF DAVID EXPOSED: STAR OF REMPHAN/MOLOCH
18 min
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5AISJDdtnl78/
Flynn calling ! a psyop is also a psyop
does the Torah refer to Israel as a place? quote please
optics maybe
no, the kikes told the locals they'd kill them all if they didn't leave
it was ethnic cleansing from the start
the first "Jew" would be Judah, Abe's grandson
then watch the video
I see no mention of God directing Moses to "Israel"
it is a people, not a place, as far as I know
probably a kike
the word is a trick conflating Judahite-Judean-Israelite-Temple/Sanhedrin
southerners think he's a jew from Scofield's notes in the margins
I assume its because Jews 'discovered' America, financed George Washington etc.
Farrakhan/NOI good breakdown of the evidence Columbus was a jew toward the start of this book about his letters to Queen Isabel
Columbus set sail a month after Jews kicked out of Spain, and he found America which Leif Ericson had already found and recorded
hospital system directed circumcision
also pushed it hard during the AIDS hoax
still ZERO mention of Israel as a place
you haven't shown any passage where Israel denotes a place
dasting
you've been stringing me along for many posts asshole
looks like you were wrong the whole time, like I already knew
scripture only, samefaggot
kek. she did it.
TY for doing your part to spread awareness
be a real shame if there were nowhere to send you
>It is generally accepted the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was a forgery. In 1921 the London Times produced conclusive proof that the Protocols were a forgery, describing the Protocols as a “clumsy forgery”. Most of the passages of the Protocols have been taken from a French political satire that never mentioned Jews – Maurice Joly’s Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864). The phrasing between the two texts is almost identical.
funny they put it that way
I believe there were two passages in the entire Protocols from there, with a lot of text between
Exactly.