You do not need to apologize to thugs. Why are they thugs? Because, it is perfectly legal to challenge an election based upon the facts at hand. If you rely on another Lawyers assertions that is called "professional consider". You didn't base you information of the lunch lady or the janitor now, did you? So why are you apologizing, you should just be outraged, and put in a motion dismiss the case based on false evidence. Relying on another attorney's truthfulness is due diligence to a degree. but is not verified due diligence. Is everyone just trying to make PDJT look bad?