fake news Reeeeee:
what about Jenna Ellis reeeeee
>wonder what this fag is doin
Eagleview
25 Methodist Hill Dr, Rochester, NY 14623
Overview
EAGLEVIEW (Registry #157715690) is a Assumed Business Name in Rochester, New York registered with the Corporation Division of Oregon Secretary of State. The business was registered on July 17, 2019. The registered business location is at 25 Methodist Hill Dr, Rochester, NY 14623. The officers registered with the business include Brian Brockmann (Authorized Representative).
Business Information
Registry Number 157715690
Business Name EAGLEVIEW
Address 25 Methodist Hill Dr
Rochester
NY 14623
Registry Date 2019-07-17
Entity Type ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME
Authorized Representative
Officer Name BRIAN BROCKMANN
Address 25 Methodist Hill Dr
Rochester
NY 14623
Principal Place Of Business
Address 25 Methodist Hill Dr
Rochester
NY 14623
Officer Information
Officers
Officer Name Title Address
BRIAN BROCKMANN Authorized Representative 25 Methodist Hill Dr, Rochester, NY 14623
Location Information
Street Address 25 METHODIST HILL DR
City ROCHESTER
State NY
Zip Code 14623
>Eagleview
>25 Methodist Hill Dr, Rochester, NY 14623
>Overview
'''Pavilion is a free search engine
for shareable, cooperativegovernment contracts.'''
Find contracts for anything. Start your search on Pavilion today.
Pictometry International Corp
About
17 contracts available
ROCHESTER, NY
Visit website
Confirmed in contract scope
â˘
computer software licensing service
â˘
ortho mosaic design
â˘
software as a service (saas)
â˘
digital imagery libraries
17 Contracts
Contract #CTR008446-1
Expires Jun 2025
GIS SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE MASTER CONTRAC Amendment #1
Shareable contract from State of Maryland
Contract #7539
Expires Nov 2023
Oblique Aerial Imagery, Licensing and Services
Contract from State of Oregon
Non-cooperative
Contract #EPP-RFP8444-5/13
Expired Feb 2009
DIGITAL GEO-REFERENCED OBLIQUE AERIAL
Shareable contract from Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department, FL
Expired
Contract #epp-rfp8444-5/13-1
Expired Feb 2010
DIGITAL GEO-REFERENCED OBLIQUE AERIAL
Shareable contract from Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department, FL
Expired
Contract #20-277-SLA
Expires Oct 2023
Geographic Information System (GIS) Aerial
Contract from Arlington County, VA
Non-cooperative
Expiring soon
Contract #EPP-RFP8444-5/13-3
Expired Feb 2012
DIGITAL GEO-REFERENCED OBLIQUE AERIAL
Shareable contract from Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department, FL
Expired
Contract #EPP-RFP8444-5/13-5
Expired Feb 2014
DIGITAL GEO-REFERENCED OBLIQUE AERIAL
Shareable contract from Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department, FL
Expired
Contract #EPP-RFP8444-5/13-4
Expired Feb 2013
DIGITAL GEO-REFERENCED OBLIQUE AERIAL
Shareable contract from Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department, FL
Expired
Contract #GS-35F-0801N, GSA SCHEDULE
Expired Jul 2023
Earth Observation Solution Software-Service, 3-2yr Projects
Shareable contract from Fauquier County, VA
Expired
Contract #220120
Expired Aug 2023
IMAGERY SERVICES
Strategic Alliance for Volume Expenditures (S.A.V.E.) shareable contract fromMaricopa County, AZ
Expired
https://www.withpavilion.com/suppliers/pictometry-international
https://vendorlink.cityoforlando.net/common/viewvendor.aspx?id=468872
>government contracts.'''
>government contracts.'''
>government contracts.'''
well whaddya know
News
Pictometry, ITT, and Harris RF Phase II of Federal Contract
February 26, 2008
Pictometry International Corp. (NY, USA), along with subcontractors ITT Corporation (Space Systems Division) and Harris RF Communications, has been awarded aPhase II contract totaling USD750,000 from the Department of Homeland Security to create a Real Time Airborne Management System (RAMS) for emergency scenarios.
The contract is part of SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research), a homeland security grant managed by the U.S. Department of the Interior. The purpose of the homeland security grant is to provide emergency response teams with vital situational awareness information during disaster situations in which critical infrastructure is heavily damaged.
"The concept for this type of real time image capture system evolved with the demand for rapid data during 9-11 and Hurricane Katrina," said Charles Mondello, Pictometry's Executive Vice President of Corporate Development. "When disaster strikes, the need for instantaneous imagery becomes critical. Until now, there really hasn't been a reliable way to get that kind of visual information as quickly as it is needed."
In Phase I of the project, Pictometry, ITT, and Harris developed a real-time imagery capture and distribution concept using an innovative architecture and data dissemination strategy designed to support decision making in the early days of a major disaster to speed response and protect lives. A more detailed working system using this technology will be created over the next two years as part of Phase II
https://www.gim-international.com/content/news/pictometry-itt-and-harris-rf-phase-ii-of-federal-contract
> PF wondering
>Holy Shit Anons: Todd Bensman:
pretty infuriating.
Thousands of âSpecial Interest Aliensâ Posing Potential National Security Risks Entering via CBP One App
By Todd Bensman on October 24, 2023
For the two-plus decades after 9/11, professionals of the U.S. homeland security enterprise have fretted about illegal immigrants from foreign nations where Islamic terrorism groups operate who, without invitation or authorization, breach the Southwest Border and enter the country every year.
The professional presumption that these immigrants pose a greater national security risk than other illegal entrants has remained great enough, in fact, that federal agencies still tag them for enhanced security screening when encountered as âSpecial Interest Aliensâ or SIAs (or due to the Biden administrationâs aversion to the word âalienâ, âSpecial Interest Migrantsâ or SIMs) to help ensure the strangers are not clandestine terrorist agents.
But new records released to the Center for Immigration Studies last week as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit reveal that the Biden administration has been authorizing thousands of SIAs for escorted entries through land ports along the border since at least May 2021, using âCBP Oneâ online interfaces such as a mobile phone app. Using this program, the administration has authorized the paroles into the country of some 7,332 SIAs from 24 of the roughly 35-40 U.S.-designated countries, including smatterings from Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, but the largest numbers coming from Muslim-majority former Soviet republics in Central Asia such as the Kyrgyz Republic, also known as Kyrgyzstan, (3,852) and Uzbekistan (1,843).1
SIA list
These government-sanctioned SIA entries are very different from the surprise illegal border crossings of SIAs with which homeland security officials traditionally have had to contend in that these ones are pre-approved before their escorted port of entry crossings, their names and biometrics ostensibly having been run through criminal database checks (though such checks have been panned as grossly inadequate).
At issue with government-authorized entries of SIAs over the land ports is whether the Biden administrationâs DHS is conducting effective enhanced security screening beyond the standard criminal database checks used for the more than 249,000 non-SIA immigrants the CIS FOIA records show it has paroled in since May 2021 through eight land ports.
That question comes at a time of heightened national concern about not only illegally entering SIA traffic at the southern border amid an historic mass migration but concern specifically about the record 270 aliens on the FBIâs terrorism watch list who have crossed illegally during the Biden administration. Because the administration has never disclosed that it was knowingly approving SIAs for its land port parole program, however, questions about vetting and purposeful choices to take on additional national security risk within the program have been neither asked nor answered.
âThatâs a really hard target to analyze, and to just shoot from the hip and let them in is absolute insanity in my book,â said James G. Conway, a retired FBI counterterrorism agent who for years after 9/11 worked in Mexico trying to vet SIAs and detect terrorists among that flow. âHow would you knowingly and wittingly bring people from terrorist countries into the United States with that level of vetting? Some of these terrorism countries donât even have an electric grid let alone a computer system, and you canât scrub them on databases that donât exist. The whole thing is insane to me.â
>Anons I know I say this too much,but this is absolutely MUST listen. Get a gun and protect your families and communities
confirmed
>Thousands of âSpecial Interest Aliensâ Posing Potential National Security Risks Entering via CBP One App
>
>By T
The Old Normal. SIAs are not regarded as terrorists but, because they arrive as almost complete strangers from nations where avowed anti-U.S. terrorist groups are prevalent, homeland security protocols dating to a 2004 CBP Memorandum (right) and still largely in effect call for SIAs to be tagged and detained until they can go through extra security screening. As detailed at length in my book, Americaâs Covert Border War, the untold story of the Nationâs battle to prevent jihadist infiltration, one of the most important protocols requires face-to-face interviews with SIAs by FBI agents, DHS intelligence officers, or members of CBPâs Tactical Terrorist Response Team. Additionally, the agents might run individuals through additional classified databases, perhaps analyze personal belongings, contact foreign intelligence services or check U.S. military intelligence data, and attempt to validate statements made in the interviews. All of this was done to determine potential terrorism involvement. SIAs found to be clean were let back into the immigration system, or if derogatory information was found, probably deported to mitigate any risk.
But that enhanced screening activity occurred in times of relatively normal border flows, when maybe 3,000 to 4,000 SIAs per year were crossing.
The greatest mass migration crisis in American history is underway now, with literally millions crossing into the United States in a few years and overwhelming that infrastructureâs ability to keep up.
Credible reports now show that more than 75,000 SIAs were among those crossing illegally between just October 2022 and August 2023. Those numbers far surpass any DHS, CBP, or FBI ability to conduct enhanced security screening interviews or investigation of so many, as I recently testified before a subcommittee of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. Border Patrol is so overwhelmed that it accidentally released an FBI watch-listed terrorist while trying to contain nonstop migrant surges, a Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General investigation of the incident shows. Other reporting shows that Mexico too has had trouble keeping watch-listed immigrants detained, such as in the case of a Yemeni suspected terrorist it accidentally released amid the crush of migrants, which includes an additional nearly two million that Border Patrol counted as âgot-awaysâ because they were detected but not apprehended.
Other strong indications have emerged that the Biden DHS has shown little interest in vetting the massive SIA traffic coming through the southern border. The Biden administration and human rights groups, for instance, in recent years have attempted to rein in CBPâs Tactical Terrorism Response Team activity along the border.
Eight months after Mexicoâs first Muslim-only immigrant shelter opened in Tijuana in April 2022, for the express purpose of helping SIAs apply for CBP One appointments for parole, its director told me that no American law enforcement or intelligence officer had ever made contact about the possibility of vetting her visitors for terrorism.
When I asked one active-duty intelligence officer for DHS working on transnational crime issues such as human smuggling if the agency was interested in the shelter, the officer quickly answered: âNo. We are not.â
Asked why, the officer responded that the shelterâs work was regarded as âhumanitarianâ and therefore immune from U.S. law enforcement interest.
âThat is no longer within the scope of our criminal investigations,â the officer said of SIAs moving through the Mexico shelter and over land ports with CBP One appointments. âBecause they are doing humanitarian work, they get to operate basically with impunity.â
It is against this backdrop that the Biden administration began approving CBP One applications from thousands of SIAs from 24 countries so far. The extent of vetting for them is up for much-warranted questioning, especially as the war between Israel and its neighbors escalates as expected and hundreds of thousands of inadmissible aliens per month continue to pour over it.
SIAs Do Get More Checks, But⌠Top DHS officials initially sold their CBP One app program to the American public on its ostensible vetting strength. According to government policy documents about it, CBP One applicants must pass ârigorous biometric and biographic national security and public safety screening and vetting.â CBP agents and U.S. processors, however, mainly run this information through criminal and domestic national security databases looking for matches to U.S. criminal records, warrants, and terrorism watch lists, those who do this work say.
But this vetting process is deeply flawed, experts say, because few if any CBP One applicants have ever lived in the United States to have committed a detectable crime
âThe only thing we can query is information that we have,â former FBI Director James Comey once said of vetting foreign national refugees. âSo, if we have no information on someone, they've never crossed our radar screen, they've never been a ripple in the pond, there will be no record of them there and so it will be challenging.â
Furthermore, a large percentage of those using the parole program hail from countries that would never feed criminal intelligence information to the Americans because they are diplomatically estranged, such as Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua. Other nations are so developmentally challenged that they are incapable of keeping track of criminals or terrorism intelligence information.
Kyrgyz women
Kyrgyzstani women at a Matamoros hotel waiting for their CBP One crossing appointments to come through study the app over breakfast. May 2023 photo by Todd Bensman.
It is in this context that Bidenâs DHS, however, has apparently recognized the higher risk of the SIAs it is accepting for parole at the land ports.
A DHS source with direct knowledge of government vetting processes for the CBP One land port parole program, who was not authorized to speak or be identified, told CIS that all of the SIAs going through the CBP One appointment and parole at the land ports are run through more databases than all non-SIA applicants â these ones containing classified intelligence information â as a means to detect terrorism problems, the source said.
That news should go some way to allay national security concern about them â but not much, because little more than those extra database checks happen before the immigrants are crossed over to the American side for final parole processing, the government official said.
And, the same official acknowledged problems mentioned by other vetting experts, that database checks canât detect information that is not in them.
The administration, nevertheless, is knowingly approving SIAs anyway from nations of national security concern whose governments are diplomatically hostile to the United States and would never cooperate, such as Iran (9 parolees), Syria (3), Yemen (1), and Afghanistan (154). But puzzlingly, the administration has approved for parole entries the largest numbers from former Soviet republics like Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan, which are not likely suited to maintain and share intelligence material.
Many are no doubt economic migrants seeking to take advantage of a unique opportunity to easily emigrate to a rich country before its leaders change their minds. One Kyrgyzstani I met at my hotel breakfast in Matamoros, Mexico, earlier this year told me, when I asked on a translation app why he had come, typed back: âBecause the door was open.â
But citizens of these countries also happen to have been implicated in terror attacks and plots around the world and also joined ISIS in Iraq and Syria in fairly significant numbers to defend an Islamic caliphate against U.S. troops.
Problematic Nations. The terrorism section of the CIAâs âWorld Factbookâ notes that U.S.-designated foreign terrorist groups have long operated in the dangerous neighborhood that all three of the most numerous of the SIAs hail from: the Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan. Afghanistan is in the same tough neighborhood.
Among the groups operating in those three countries are the Islamic Jihad Union, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, and ISIS-Khorasan. But there are many other extremist groups operating in the region too, such as the Islamic Renaissance Party of Tajikistan and various ISIS-affiliated groups the government has suppressed, according to the U.S. State Departmentâs 2021 Country Report on Terrorism for Tajikistan, and who might want to flee to the United States.
The same report notes that terrorist group members move throughout the mostly unguarded borders of these countries, with Tajikistan asserting that âthousands of militantsâ come and go from neighboring Afghanistan.
As one indication of public sentiment toward Islamic extremist ideology in the Kyrgyz Republic, an estimated 850 of its citizens reportedly joined ISIS between 2013 and 2015, and regional scholars insist the real number is higher, according to George Washington Universityâs Counter Extremism Project.
Uzbekistan also has figured prominently in global counterterrorism efforts, in part because the internationally designated terrorist organization known as the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan has had regional and global reach and regularly conducts attacks. Extremists from Uzbekistan have been implicated in U.S. attacks and plots too. Hundreds of Uzbeks also fought for ISIS and many have returned.
Conway told me he was stunned to learn the Biden administration was taking such risks in willingly approving entries of SIAs from Central Asia, a region where anti-American sentiment runs sky high and security vetting must be done hurriedly under the pressure of mass migration crisis.
âWhatâs the motivation? I mean, why would they do that?â he asked of the Biden administration.
Report 2
==New Records Unveil Surprising Scope of Secretive âCBP Oneâ Entry Scheme
Began far earlier and let in many more nationalities in far greater numbers than publicly disclosed==
By Todd Bensman on October 24, 2023
In January 2023, the Biden Administration announced what has become the cornerstone of its ânew lawful pathwaysâ strategy to manage the historic volumes of foreign nationals illegally crossing the U.S Southwest border.
CBP line in Matamoros
CBP One appointment recipients wait in long lines on the Matamoros, Mexico, side of an international bridge waiting to be called in by CBP officers on the Brownsville, Texas, side. May 2023 photo by Todd Bensman.
The White House announcement explained that inadmissible aliens from four of the most numerous nationalities crossing illegally â Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, Haitians, and Cubans â would be able to use the âCBP Oneâ mobile phone app to schedule an appointment with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers, in order to be escorted through a port of entry (POE) and quickly granted temporary âhumanitarian paroleâ and released into the country.
Whether walking through a land port or flying in at government invitation, all such âparoledâ immigrants are released on their own recognizance, signing an agreement to report to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in their town of their choice and apply for two-year renewable work permits.
The purpose of this âlawful pathwaysâ strategy was to reduce the number of illegal crossings by funneling inadmissible aliens âlawfullyâ through the ports of entry. It was developed to address the end of the pandemic-era Title 42 public health order that allowed DHS to rapidly expel migrants who had crossed the border illegally. The White House explained that the program was intended to âreduce the number of individuals crossing unlawfully between ports of entry.â The proposed regulation undergirding the strategy claimed that reducing illegal crossings by rechanneling border crossers into pre-authorized port entries would protect the migrants from smugglers and prevent âextreme overcrowding in border facilities.â
In the year since the administration switched to the âlawful pathwaysâ strategy, Bidenâs Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has offered little information on the total number, nationalities, and means of arrival (land or air) of individuals it has brought into the United States through this program.
It has defied requests for the data from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), members of Congress, and left-leaning migrant advocacy groups interested in knowing the totality, diversity, and mechanics of these scheduled paroles.
But CIS has obtained this data through Freedom of Information Act litigation. DHSâs uncharacteristically candid disclosures to CIS may have something to do with the fact that House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-Tenn.) had apparently been seeking similar information, only in his case backed up by a subpoena threat.
The data shows, in part, that nearly 250,000 foreign nationals through August 2023 have been paroled into the United States at the land border ports after scheduling crossing appointments with the CPB One mobile phone app. Of that total, only 136,000 came from Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, the advertised beneficiaries; the rest, more than 100,000, came from a startlingly broad array of 93 other countries.
These numbers are in addition to some 221,000 whom the administration permitted to fly into U.S. airports (through mid-September) under a different parole program, as revealed in a previous CIS report from the same CIS FOIA litigation. (See âNew Records Show Biden DHS Has Approved Hundreds of Thousands of Migrants for Secretive Foreign Flights Directly into U.S. Airportsâ.)
The records raise hard questions about those decisions.
âSpecial Interest Aliensâ. For example, the Biden administration accepted foreign nationals from 24 nations designated by the U.S. government as being of national security concern because Islamic terrorist organizations operate in them. U.S. homeland security professionals have long tagged foreign nationals from such countries as âspecial interest aliensâ (SIAs) â or in the current Biden administration parlance âspecial interest migrantsâ (SIMs) â regarding them as higher risks that warrant more security vetting. In the past, the government has been forced to contend with SIAs because they crossed illegally of their own volitions and got caught.
But in the case of these CBP-One programs, the government affirmatively chose to authorize their parole entries, distinguishing the act as an affirmative government choice.
>New Records Unveil Surprising Scope of Secretive âCBP Oneâ Entry Scheme
>Began far earlier and let in many more nationalities in far greater numbers than publicly disclosed
Among those the government chose to parole in on CBP One app appointments were a smattering of âspecial Interest aliensâ from Iran, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Yemen, Indonesia, and even 154 Afghans.
Others the government approved to come in surprisingly high numbers despite their being from special interest nations were 3,852 Kyrgyzstanis, 1,843 Uzbekistanis, 780 Tajikistanis, and 339 Kazakhstanis, and 29 from Turkmenistan, not to mention many more from terror-plagued Africa countries such as Egypt, Senegal, and Mauritania.
Because these approved entrances have remained unknown to the American public, the Biden administration has not been questioned about whether it conducted enhanced security screening for these migrants (as was the practice with those caught crossing illegally) before affirming them for parole through ports.
Other records from the CIS FOIA litigation strongly suggest that whatever security vetting does occur may not be very thorough, because U.S. officials have approved 99.7 percent of all such applicants for parole, rejecting only 698 individuals out of hundreds of thousands. The government has withheld all information on the handful of rejections.
Mexicans? Russians? Perhaps most mysterious of the Biden administrationâs CBP One decisions is bringing in through the land ports on humanitarian protection grounds more than 57,000 Mexican nationals, representing the largest single nationality in the program. This is clearly part of an unknown in-house program probably unrelated to any need for humanitarian intervention because Mexican citizens almost never qualify for U.S. protections and are rejected for asylum at a rate of 96 percent, so relatively few bother to apply.
In other mysterious decisions that have never been questioned, Bidenâs DHS paroled in at the land ports nearly 24,000 Russians, clearly a premediated war-related policy decision with potential diplomatic implications, but which drew little if any inquiry because few people have known about it.
News of this unique American scheme allowing inadmissible aliens to schedule their illegal immigration has reached the farthest corners of the planet. The administration approved more than 1,086 Armenians, 888 from Belarus, 244 from Azerbaijan, and dozens from mainland China and Mongolia.
Inadmissible aliens from 21 African countries also walked over via CBP One, including people from South Africa, Togo, Gabon, Namibia, and Guinea-Bissau. Nationals from 13 countries of South America also entered, among them relatively untroubled nations such as Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Bolivia, Suriname, and Guyana.
Some cases are so strange as to demand public explanation. Small numbers were let in from France, Spain, Greece, Poland, and Hungary, democracies not known as hotbeds of political persecution. One even came in from Canada, another from the United Kingdom and yet another from âBritish Indian Ocean Territoryâ. This is hard to explain given that many of these countries have visa waiver agreements with the United States and can enter at will through normal travel channels.
Birth of the Parole Machine. Beyond the dataâs value in prompting questions about those approval decisions, the records show that the administration began secretively providing escorted CPB One entries-by-appointment through the border land ports a full 19 months before publicly unveiling a supercharged version of it to the American media in January 2023 as something brand new. It all began in May 2021. There werenât many, by comparison with 2023. But by the time the administration announced its brand ânewâ CBP One parole scheme in January 2023, it had already quietly allowed 23,314 to enter without public acknowledgement.
It started with little publicity at a few border crossing towns such as Reynosa, Mexico, where CIS in November 2021 first stumbled upon and reported that an unusual new program of some sort was underway. (See âInside a Most Unusual Mexican Migrant Campâ.)
This was long before the cell phone app was rolled out, and as CIS noted in yet another report about the CBP One program a year later, from inside the CBP One operation of a Mexicali, Mexico, non-government organizations were then helping a growing number of inadmissible aliens from a great many different countries, including special interest aliens, fill out all the CPB One desktop fields in coordination with Mexican and American officials on both sides. (See âLegalizing Border Crossing for All: The Next Stage of Bidenâs Migration Crisisâ.)
The new data shows that, in 2021, the administration paroled 10,303 inadmissible aliens from 29 countries, most of them from Mexico (3,798), Honduras (3,004), and Guatemala (1,366), who would ordinarily have been subject to Title 42 quick returns to Mexico.
In 2022, the administration paroled over 13,011 inadmissible aliens from an expanded range of 35 nationalities as word spread around the globe, even if few Americans knew it existed.
That year, 2022, one of several surprising new nationalities showed up and topped the list: more than 5,000 Russians, we now know, undoubtedly including some of the Chechens CIS encountered at a Muslims-only migrant shelter that opened in Tijuana in April 2022, which was helping them use the CBP One scheduling process. At the same shelter, CIS learned that volunteer staff were helping migrants from U.S.-designated countries of national security concern use the CBP One scheduling process, among them Uzbekistanis, Tajikistanis, and Afghans. (See âMexicoâs First Muslim Immigrant Shelter: A U.S. National Security Perspectiveâ.) But CBP never responded to CIS phone and email inquiries about this unreported program.
As 2023 was approaching, Biden administration officials must have seen that a streamlined, scaled-up version of the parole program might forestall bad political optics if U.S. intelligence community predictions came true that the biggest numbers of migrants yet would illegally flood the U.S. borderlands after the May 12 end of Title 42. Fewer migrants, however, would be seen or counted as illegal crossers if they were instead channeled, under color of law, through the less visible international bridges and port buildings out of sight of news camera drones.
Thatâs when the administration announced in January 2023 that it would streamline CBP One parole process, and hugely expand use of parole.