The great irony with Q Research in its current form is that it actually breeds great animosity and sows division. Allow me to explain.
If I say something the majority of anons agree with, nobody will care. It’s highly probable that nobody will even notice. BUT, if I say something that people disagree with, THAT is when anons engage. As a result, anons simply devolve into making controversial statements and being contrarian just for kicks. What follows is the degradation of dialog, research, and overall contributions to the original QR mandate.
None of this is up for debate. I am watching it happen as I type this.