This is why it's bullshit when anons claim they understand most of Q's drops. We have the general picture, some proofs, and some specific happenings but that's about it.
Basically, they of course decided not to prosecute her and set up a sham investigation to reflect that decision. This was obvious to me in 2016. This news isn't eye-opening for for the public. It just grinds on our patience.
Horowitz already testified that there was no political bias in not going after Hillary. IG reports can be changed, maybe, but testimony under oath?
Go to 21:30
It's his report
The fact remains that Horowitz testified under oath that there was no bias. That is explained by citing all the other problems in the world, of which many are due to Hillary? What kind of logic is that?
So the hearings about Hillary are pointless because deep down in the hidden redactions of the real IG report lies the evidence that will topple the Roths, or else the IG report was a huge waste of time because Hillary is almost at the top of the power brokers.
Interesting, right? Strzok gets thrown under the bus and Hillary skates.
Add another one for Horowitz's perjury then
Shit, I don't mention Q to anyone. I have a hard enough time convincing people why Trump is helping America in the obvious ways they should be able to see.