Anonymous ID: 8ada5a Oct. 29, 2023, 9:11 p.m. No.19828698   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8709

>>19828668

Lobsters were so abundant in the early days—residents in the Massachusetts Bay Colony found they washed up on the beach in two-foot-high piles—that people thought of them as trash food. It was fit only for the poor and served to servants or prisoners. In 1622, the governor of Plymouth Plantation, William Bradford, was embarrassed to admit to newly arrived colonists that the only food they "could presente their friends with was a lobster … without bread or anyhting else but a cupp of fair water" (original spelling preserved). Later, rumor has it, some in Massachusetts revolted and the colony was forced to sign contracts promising that indentured servants wouldn’t be fed lobster more than three times a week.

 

“Lobster shells about a house are looked upon as signs of poverty and degradation,” wrote John J. Rowan in 1876. Lobster was an unfamiliar, vaguely disgusting bottom feeding ocean dweller that sort of did (and does) resemble an insect, its distant relative. The very word comes from the Old English loppe, which means spider. People did eat lobster, certainly, but not happily and not, usually, openly. Through the 1940s, for instance, American customers could buy lobster meat in cans (like spam or tuna), and it was a fairly low-priced can at that. In the 19th century, when consumers could buy Boston baked beans for 53 cents a pound, canned lobster sold for just 11 cents a pound. People fed lobster to their cats.

…the lobster’s fate took a lucky turn in the late 1800s. Railway managers discovered if they billed it as a delicacy, passengers who didn’t know of its disgusting reputation thought it was delicious. As the years went by, lobster started showing up in salad bars, and by the 1920s, it had become the food of choice for the world’s aristocrats. The lobster’s popularity took a dive during the Great Depression, once again becoming a food for the poor, but by the 1950s, it was back in vogue and had become the luxury food…

https://psmag.com/economics/how-lobster-got-fancy-59440

Anonymous ID: 8ada5a Oct. 29, 2023, 9:51 p.m. No.19828856   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8866 >>8896

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/oct/26/ghost-towns-federal-office-buildings-are-80-vacant/ (paywall)

https://archive.ph/ML6Rr

Federal office buildings are 80% vacant

Not a single agency topped 50% use, GAO reported.

Investigators said excess space has been a “long-standing challenge,” but the coronavirus pandemic and growing demands by employees to be allowed to telework raised the problem to crisis levels, with the government paying for massive square footage it just doesn’t need anymore.

“During the pandemic, federal agencies operated under a maximum telework posture, with many employees working away from the office,” said David Marroni, acting director of GAO’s physical infrastructure team. “As the country emerges from the pandemic and agencies continue to offer telework as an option, the federal government has a unique opportunity to reconsider how much and what type of office space it needs.”

But getting agencies to rethink their space is a tough sell.

For one thing, agency bigwigs say the government will have to spend money to save money. The Agriculture Department told investigators that it is aware of its challenges, but figuring out a hybrid office where in-person and remote work are both accommodated would require millions of dollars of investment in planning — money the agency doesn’t have.

Officials also told investigators they worry that the telework boom might be a fading fad, and if they ditch the space they could be caught in a bind when workers do come rushing back.

And agencies are reluctant to share, the GAO said.