Anonymous ID: e02c2e Oct. 30, 2023, 8:16 a.m. No.19830676   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0733

>>19830649

Crescent Moon of the Nation of Islam/Muslim Brotherhood noted in background.

 

Libya

Tripoli-tania (Libya)

North Carolina

Camp Lejeune–From the Halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Tripoli.

USMC Master Gunnery Sergeant - Palm Tree (E-9)

Anonymous ID: e02c2e Oct. 30, 2023, 9:06 a.m. No.19830867   🗄️.is đź”—kun

How to get rid of an unwanted erection

Medically reviewed by Daniel Murrell, M.D. — By Lana Burgess — Updated on July 19, 2023

Overview

Seven ways to stop an erection

How to talk to children about erections

When to see a doctor

Takeaway

There are various things a person can do if they want to get rid of an erection. These include repositioning, meditating, showering in cold water, and more.

 

The most obvious way to stop an erection is to ejaculate. This is not always possible or appropriate, so it can be helpful to understand other ways to get rid of one.

 

As erections start in early life, this article also details how parents can talk to their children about erections.

 

Erections start in early life. They are healthy bodily functions that happen several times a day for most men. A 2013 studyTrusted Source found that the average erection is 5.6 inches long.

 

In adulthood, erections may happen when a man is sexually aroused or for other reasons. The different types of erection include:

 

Reflexogenic: These occur in response to touch.

Psychogenic: These happen in response to sexual thoughts or fantasies.

Nocturnal: These happen while a man is asleep. On average a man experiences five of these a night, and they last for an average of 30 minutes.

Testosterone plays a role in erectile function. In an erection, a small amount of blood travels to the penis. That action, together with hormones, muscles, and nerves, makes the penis stiffen.

 

Erections make sexual intercourse possible, but having an erection does not always mean a man wants to masturbate or engage in sexual activities.

 

Random, unwanted erections affect many men. They are not usually a sign of a health condition, but they may make a person feel uncomfortable or embarrassed.

 

Seven ways to stop an erection

  1. Waiting calmly

  2. Meditation

  3. Distraction

  4. Repositioning

  5. Showering in cold water

  6. Having a warm bath

  7. Gentle exercise

 

Having erections several times a day is natural. However, some situations may require medical treatment.

 

Having an erection without an orgasm can sometimes lead to a short-term condition called epididymal hypertension. This condition is informally known as “blue balls.”

 

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320499

 

Or, take the easy way out.

Cut it off and become a Chick

That's what they want anyway

To sell moar Beauty Products like MK (Mary Kay)

Anonymous ID: e02c2e Oct. 30, 2023, 9:32 a.m. No.19830948   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1022 >>1369

>>19830914

PUBLISH DATE:NOVEMBER 21, 2019

NIKKI HALEY SENT CLASSIFIED EMAILS ON AN UNCLASSIFIED EMAIL SYSTEM

 

In July 2017, shortly after a North Korean missile launch, then-UN Ambassador Nikki Haley sent multiple emails containing classified information on an unclassified email system. Those emails were obtained by American Oversight through Freedom of Information Act litigation and reported on by the Daily Beast on Wednesday, and have prompted widespread outrage from those noting the distorted attention given to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email use.

 

In the span of just over five hours, Haley sent at least five emails containing classified information apparently related to North Korea’s test launch on July 4, 2017, of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). The documents also suggest that Haley intentionally used her less-secure, unclassified email for these sensitive communications — on a matter of great importance to U.S. national security — because she had forgotten the password for her classified email system.

 

During the Obama administration, State Department officials — including, most notably, Clinton — were the subject of intense public scrutiny and criticism for having used unclassified systems to send and receive protected information. Indeed, President Donald Trump continues to criticize the previous administration for just that, tweeting about it as recently as this past summer.

 

But less than a year after chants of “Lock her up!” rang out at Trump campaign rallies, the country was facing escalating tension with North Korea. North Korean state media reported that the missile it had just tested was capable of striking the “heart of the United States” with “large heavy nuclear warheads,” only making more obvious the serious U.S. national security implications of the test launch. The U.N. Security Council called an emergency meeting for the following day, July 5.

 

American Oversight filed FOIA requests and eventually sued for records related to the missile launch, and among the documents provided by the State Department were the five emails, four with the subject line of “DPRK” (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea). The State Department determined that all five of these emails — as well as the emails her staff sent in response — contained classified information, signified by the use of B1.4 redactions. Redactions marked “1.4(D)” indicate classified information related to U.S. foreign relations and activities, including confidential sources, and those marked “1.4(B)” concern classified foreign government information.

 

https://www.americanoversight.org/nikki-haley-sent-classified-emails-on-an-unclassified-email-system

 

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6552525-State-Department-Records-Regarding-a-North-Korea#document/p83/a536771

Anonymous ID: e02c2e Oct. 30, 2023, 9:52 a.m. No.19831025   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1030 >>1284 >>1294 >>1369

>>19831006

>we gotta let people know who brung it to 'em!

 

How Kamala Harris Fought to Keep Nonviolent Prisoners Locked Up

 

As California attorney general, she spent years subverting a 2011 Supreme Court ruling requiring the state to reduce its prison population. The overseeing judicial panel nearly found the state in contempt of court.

 

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), a leading candidate to be Joe Biden’s running mate, repeatedly and openly defied U.S. Supreme Court orders to reduce overcrowding in California prisons while serving as the state’s attorney general, according to legal documents reviewed by the Prospect. Working in tandem with Gov. Jerry Brown, Harris and her legal team filed motions that were condemned by judges and legal experts as obstructionist, bad-faith, and nonsensical, at one point even suggesting that the Supreme Court lacked the jurisdiction to order a reduction in California’s prison population.

 

The intransigence of this legal work resulted in the presiding judges in the case giving serious consideration to holding the state in contempt of court. Observers worried that the behavior of Harris’s office had undermined the very ability of federal judges to enforce their legal orders at the state level, pushing the federal court system to the brink of a constitutional crisis. This extreme resistance to a Supreme Court ruling was done to prevent the release of fewer than 5,000 nonviolent offenders, whom multiple courts had cleared as presenting next to no risk of recidivism or threat to public safety.

 

Despite a straightforward directive from the Supreme Court to identify prisoners for release over a two-year period, upholding a 2009 ruling that mandated the same action over the same timeline, the state spent the majority of that period seesawing back and forth between dubious legal filings and flagrant disregard. By early 2013, it became clear that the state had no intention to comply, leading to a series of surprisingly combative exchanges.

 

While Harris’s ultimately unsuccessful presidential campaign saw questions raised about her criminalization of truancy and her tough-on-crime reputation during her time as San Francisco’s district attorney, her role in California’s prison reduction case largely flew under the radar, though it was decried at the time. As concerns grow about Donald Trump’s subversion of the law—he, along with his attorney general, William Barr, is currently defying a Supreme Court ruling by refusing to restart the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program—the potential Democratic vice-presidential nominee engaging in relatively similar obstinacy is jarring.

 

Sen. Harris’s office has yet to respond to a set of questions from the Prospect.

 

HOW DID HARRIS’S office turn a simple court order to release low-risk prisoners to prevent cruel and unusual punishment into a constitutional fiasco?

 

Federal courts seldom look to prisoner release; it’s a remedy of last resort. But California was a unique case, with its uniquely awful prison system. At its height, it was stuffed to some 200 percent of its designed capacity. There were not enough beds or medical personnel but an extreme excess of bodies. In one prison, 54 prisoners shared a single toilet. Preventable deaths due to substandard and overstretched medical care occurred every five to six days. Suicidal inmates were locked in telephone-booth sized cages for 24 hours at a time.

 

For nearly two decades, Republican and Democratic administrations essentially ignored the problem, despite constitutional protections for prisoners against cruel and unusual punishment enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Finally, in 2009, a federal district court found that no other plausible solution existed for getting the state to conform to a constitutionally reasonable standard than a forced prisoner release. An earlier pledge, given before Harris’s time, to quickly build new prisons was not seen as credible, especially amid the Great Recession and California’s limited finances. The district court mandated that the state enact a series of decarceration measures to reduce the prison population to 137.5 percent of its design capacity within two years.

 

https://prospect.org/justice/how-kamala-harris-fought-to-keep-nonviolent-prisoners-locked-up/