>>19835681
>>19835681
meant for this one
Oh, I see.
Guess this must fall under the BO's definition of spam against which we are being protected.
February, not January
>February 2018
I was referencing myself.
I actually came by way of weed site of all things, but my CT days go back 40 years.
To be fair, there are very few on that list that haven't already been achieved.
Anything has got to be better than those shitty memes and bot-like behaviour.