until i hear straight from the crumbs otherwise, i trust my logic process which led me to this point.
Q used the word ultimate.
ultimate doesn't mean biggest or greatest of best, it means LAST.
what's the LAST question regarding Q?
once Q is revealed, no more Q.
the LAST question, therefore, is who is Q?
i appreciate your call of B.S., as it forces me to strengthen my position.
your capture gives four definitions:
1) Final
1a) Fundamental
1b) Maximum Strength
2) Most Extreme
using all four of these definitions eliminates all other possible questions.
1a) fundamental to the validity of Q-crumbs is the validity of Q.
1b) the maximum-strength question which could break all of the validity of what we think we know? "Who is your source?"
2) the most extreme question we could possibly answer is where did this intel come from? WHO knows this stuff?
what other question could possibly fill these meanings?
just unearthed this 2006 opinion piece.
Gwen Bellcourt was the spokesperson for her campaign!
2004 - Rutnik/Bellcourt work for and escape NXIVM
2006 - Bellcourt represents Gillibrand's campaign
this is an op-ed letter to the editor, so i'm looking for more info - but if this is true…
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Z581uxcnIrUJ:https://poststar.com/news/opinion/mailbag/gillibrand-s-finances-deserve-closer-look/article_42656e42-f259-5524-9334-7c9f98bf2574.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us