>>1984690

>>1984605 (lb)

Both articles that Q referenced has no option to respond for readers. I found that interesting. Comments would prompt most readers to ask, "Well who is Q", "What do they stand for or believe"? Just an observation.

I think most people understand that we cannot trust such journalism and if we cannot question someone's point of view there is no true discussion, they just want us to take them at their word and the first article is an opinion piece.

Q is correct, they are afraid of us. Patriots. They are afraid of Patriots that want to change our country for the best. Let that sink in.

Can't wait until the narratives are completely destroyed and nothing remains but truth.

>>1985314

To consider this further this gives us, the anons nowhere to voice our concerns or to oppose the piece in its content. How convenient for them. But the fact that these were written can be attributed to their strong need to denounce us as the truth coming out is inevitable. WWG1WGA.