Turn the clock (has to be back, IMO)
Bottom to top
Future explains past
Assuming/expounding on command sequence is:
POTUS tweet (pair)
Q drop/post confirm set conditions)
POTUS Tweet (pair) Confirm/GO
Q drop post confirm/GO received
Twatter being newest first, you have to go back in time to see first sequence of POTUS tweets, that is you would need to read bottom up and only by newer Tweets/posts do the older Tweets/posts have any sifnificence.
Seems logical to go back to 1st appearence of Q drops and find POTUS tweets at that point in the past.
Make list column 1 Potus tweets oldest first in correct chrono sequence
Make column 2 Q drops oldest first in correct chron sequence
Look for connections.
I think the Potus Tweets / Q drop / Potus tweet/ Q confirm sequence only within a short time frame is not likely.
What we saw was for illustrative puroposes.
More likely Tweets/corresponding posts are spread out over a longer time range and may be nested.
non-nested would be:
If
then
endif
or, assuming misspelling are conditions:
if , and
then
endif
(or similar)
Nested would be:
If
then
if
then
if, and
then
endif
endif
endif
(or similar)
Also, if nested, first commmand would be general, nested command would be more specific.
Example
Drain swamp
freeze assets
make arrests
if flee
close airports
endif
endif
endif
endif
I think this is why Q says we would need the map/graphic open.
You have to have a visual on the Tweets and corresponding posts so when an event occurs it can more easily be matched, especially those over a long time frame
A Tweet/post pair may be referring to a more specific event and have timestamps closer together, or they may be referring to a more general event and have timestamps further apart.