Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 12:29 a.m. No.19902   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0697

>>19689

>Two voices will call out in a silence that all will hear.

 

>This made me raise an eyebrow.

>Two witnesses?

>https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_witnesses

 

 

>>19712

>It's possible that it's talking about the Two Witnesses.

 

>>19760

>perhaps the 2 silent witnesses are Seth Rich +

 

>>19794

> I was thinking of speaking in silence as in speaking during a funeral. So at a funeral, which is broadcast to the whole world, two voices speak as the world grieve in silence?

 

This?

>>19834

 

>>perhaps the 2 silent witnesses are Seth Rich +

> J. Christopher Stevens?

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 12:50 a.m. No.20002   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0027 >>0060 >>0080

>>19984

 

I'm just going to throw out the suggestion because this keeps coming up:

 

ZULU time does not use time zones. It also does not make use of daylight saving adjustments.

ALL forensic data being collated for this Project should use ZULU timestamps, to avoid ANY mischaracterization, by ANYONE.

 

That is all.

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 1:14 a.m. No.20117   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0131 >>0134

>>20086

 

That was put in place by anon and Q, jointly, for two reasons.

 

1) cbts implosion and betrayal of trust.

2) thestorm implosion and betrayal of trust. Almost immediately, I might add.

 

(We) go where the Patriots go. The location is irrelevant.

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 1:45 a.m. No.20219   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0223 >>0224

>>20192

>I'm deleting all posts about preserving privacy of the board because those rules I screenshot have been remove

 

>>20196

>Board privacy was a consensus between anons and BO, In black and white in the very first breads here.

>Suggesting removing it is highly suspicious, anon.

 

>>20201

>You're not paying attention. I am complaining about those rules being removed.

 

 

No, you stated you were removing all privacy verbiage, which is something other than "I am complaining about those rules being removed"

 

Now I am suspicious as fuck, and every other anon should be, too.

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 2:11 a.m. No.20291   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20274

 

This whole meta commentary has just reminded me of this:

 

In the run up to the 2016 election cycle, the MSM was actively shitting on patriots and patriotism, trying to link it to the provocateur groups.

 

Remember that. They have been libeling Patriots since way before the election. They were grooming the normies to REJECT the Repubic.

 

Falling into the cult of personality trap that has become R vs D would be a big mistake, after this is all over.

 

They gave us no quarter. They in turn, deserve none.

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 3:03 a.m. No.20414   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0419 >>0421 >>0485

>>20405

>>20405

>Save it for Nuremberg.

 

Yeah, this. I've actually become aware of a tell over the years, also:

 

"It was an honest mistake!". Anytime you hear a news presenter, (or anyone else under the lights for that matter) say that, it's a fucking lie. They might as well have said "Oh shit, caught me lying again!"

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 3:49 a.m. No.20502   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20489

>>20489

>The format of POTUS tweet with questions makes me excited.

>We've been teasing with the idea of a Twitter campaign โ€ฆ

>POTUS is spearheading that campaign.

 

Leading by example for that is worthy of praise.

God bless and protect POTUS

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 3:57 a.m. No.20520   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20510

 

โ€ฆAnd now you know why (((they))) want to shut the internet down and institute curators and gatekeepers.

 

Because if a very intelligent man with humility before God,and a love for his Republic under God comes to understand how to make use of itโ€ฆ Heads roll.

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 4:12 a.m. No.20565   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0574

>>20540

>>20541

>But let's be clear it appears "flaw" was purposeful.

 

"Honest mistake! Really!"

 

I absolutely agree that the flaw was intentional and further, it was executed with the ramifications of doing it being known to all parties involved in the decision.

 

Which is a tough one because most normies simply do not understand that their view of "privacy" is quaint and naive, and has been for at least a decade, considering what we now know.

Anonymous ID: 69288d Jan. 11, 2018, 4:43 a.m. No.20674   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0689 >>0693

re: the word ZERO coming up times in tweets/qposts also appears in connection to the speculative execution side-channel exploits, from an AMD webpage, of all places:

 

"When AMD learned that researchers had discovered a new CPU attack targeting the speculative execution functionality used by multiple chip companiesโ€™ products, we immediately engaged across the ecosystem to address the teamsโ€™ findings."

 

And that group isโ€ฆ. Google Project Zero (GPZ)

 

http:// www.amd.com/en/corporate/speculative-execution

 

The curious wording POTUS used in his tweet with a capitalized Intel..

 

Were Google/ABC/C-A misusing these vulns in nefarious ways?