God bless the bakers, the dough, and the bread they provide us, so it edifies (us), and confuses (((our enemies))). Bless and protect all of the Patriots in our midst, in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
>Two voices will call out in a silence that all will hear.
>This made me raise an eyebrow.
>Two witnesses?
>https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_witnesses
>It's possible that it's talking about the Two Witnesses.
>perhaps the 2 silent witnesses are Seth Rich +
> I was thinking of speaking in silence as in speaking during a funeral. So at a funeral, which is broadcast to the whole world, two voices speak as the world grieve in silence?
This?
>>perhaps the 2 silent witnesses are Seth Rich +
> J. Christopher Stevens?
>Nope, anyone telling the truth on this is banned.
Incorrect. Anyone using blatant shill tactics is being banned. With video proof of the reason. Fuck a goat and like it.
Don't. Let them find their own truths, if they are in fact interested in the truth. Which I doubt.
I'm just going to throw out the suggestion because this keeps coming up:
ZULU time does not use time zones. It also does not make use of daylight saving adjustments.
ALL forensic data being collated for this Project should use ZULU timestamps, to avoid ANY mischaracterization, by ANYONE.
That is all.
aw c'mon.. I expected at least something witty and intelligent.. That's what I get for having expectations I guess
That was put in place by anon and Q, jointly, for two reasons.
1) cbts implosion and betrayal of trust.
2) thestorm implosion and betrayal of trust. Almost immediately, I might add.
(We) go where the Patriots go. The location is irrelevant.
Found the concern fag.
Board privacy was a consensus between anons and BO, In black and white in the very first breads here.
Suggesting removing it is highly suspicious, anon.
>I'm deleting all posts about preserving privacy of the board because those rules I screenshot have been remove
>Board privacy was a consensus between anons and BO, In black and white in the very first breads here.
>Suggesting removing it is highly suspicious, anon.
>You're not paying attention. I am complaining about those rules being removed.
No, you stated you were removing all privacy verbiage, which is something other than "I am complaining about those rules being removed"
Now I am suspicious as fuck, and every other anon should be, too.
>But it really isn't D vs R anyway, right?
Nope. That time is long past.
It's Patriots vs Traitors this time.
This whole meta commentary has just reminded me of this:
In the run up to the 2016 election cycle, the MSM was actively shitting on patriots and patriotism, trying to link it to the provocateur groups.
Remember that. They have been libeling Patriots since way before the election. They were grooming the normies to REJECT the Repubic.
Falling into the cult of personality trap that has become R vs D would be a big mistake, after this is all over.
They gave us no quarter. They in turn, deserve none.
>Save it for Nuremberg.
Yeah, this. I've actually become aware of a tell over the years, also:
"It was an honest mistake!". Anytime you hear a news presenter, (or anyone else under the lights for that matter) say that, it's a fucking lie. They might as well have said "Oh shit, caught me lying again!"
>No nets
Didn't JA have their internet interrupted around that time frame? or am I mistaken?
word. I see this a lot in the studies that are geared towards regulating consumer products that undercut big pharma profits. It's a thing.
โฆAnd now you know why (((they))) want to shut the internet down and institute curators and gatekeepers.
Because if a very intelligent man with humility before God,and a love for his Republic under God comes to understand how to make use of itโฆ Heads roll.
Or switch to AMDโฆ Right? AMD didn't have the flaw, last I saw reported.. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>But let's be clear it appears "flaw" was purposeful.
"Honest mistake! Really!"
I absolutely agree that the flaw was intentional and further, it was executed with the ramifications of doing it being known to all parties involved in the decision.
Which is a tough one because most normies simply do not understand that their view of "privacy" is quaint and naive, and has been for at least a decade, considering what we now know.
kek get over yourself. a very small count of those would even know what speculative execution side-channel attacks are.
re: the word ZERO coming up times in tweets/qposts also appears in connection to the speculative execution side-channel exploits, from an AMD webpage, of all places:
"When AMD learned that researchers had discovered a new CPU attack targeting the speculative execution functionality used by multiple chip companiesโ products, we immediately engaged across the ecosystem to address the teamsโ findings."
And that group isโฆ. Google Project Zero (GPZ)
http:// www.amd.com/en/corporate/speculative-execution
The curious wording POTUS used in his tweet with a capitalized Intel..
Were Google/ABC/C-A misusing these vulns in nefarious ways?
Possible