>>19866

Pay attention.

>>19879

You're having a conversation with yourself.

There is no explanation fro why some anons are saying that Elon Musk is suddenly a good guy when we know the exact opposite from Q.

>>19892

Ok filtering you now asshole. Keep saying "disinfo" over and over again is a level of stupidity I can't reach.

[Bye.]

>>19921

Interaction to continue on dedicated /research/ board.

Q

>>19969

You asked why this board exists. I showed you the Q post saying they will be interacting here. What more do you want?

(This board is NOT for normies and nobody should be directing them here.)

>>19988

They are saying the Secret Service did it which is what Q told us.

>>19991

SpaceX, Musk = enemies

Zuma sabotaged by Patriots

>>20001

That's like saying it's not raining now so the rain has stopped forever. I wasn't talking to you anyway asshole. Piss off.

>>20018

"Musk, SpaceX = enemies" confirmed by Q.

"Zuma sabotaged by Patriots" = my take, my hope, my prayer

>>20017

Just keep bitching about nothing and contributing nothing. I won't be seeing you anymore.

[Bye.]

>>20042

A fake Q? That doesn't even make sense. So what, they killed the whole Q team and are now pretending to be them? And they have the same pen and same contact with POTUS who tweets their markers? What planet/drugs are you on?

If Musk really did get that Zuma satellite up it's very bad news. Congress are saying it went down and is a total loss. I am praying that's true.

>>20074

So it's dead.

OpSec Rules have disappeared?

>>20132

Only asking because I got in a big discussion about this on Twit yesterday and posted this screenshot. Now the OpSec Rules are gone.

>>20154

Obviously it's relevant to me and to the mission. That's why I'm asking. It's just a simple question. Much easier to just answer than turn it into another fucking debate.

>>20169

Sorry. You mean are the two connected. I personally do not see a connection. I just want to know if the rules have changed so I don't look like an idiot telling people that BO requests not to be linked on social media.

Not getting a response so I'm deleting all posts about preserving privacy of the board because those rules I screenshot have been removed and people have enough bad impressions about this campaign already.

>>20189

Looks like they do partner swapping.

>>20196

You're not paying attention. I am complaining about those rules being removed.

>>20209

Thank you. Much appreciated. Been scolding people on SM and showing them those rules and they come back with "I don't see that anywhere on the board." Consistency is key.

>>20219

You are retarded as fuck. You would need to read the whole conversation to make an intelligent response. The current baker has already said they would put the rules back so the problem has been solved. Move on.

>>20240

Put two "greater than" symbols in front of the post number like this: >>20085

>>20239

>>20227

Musk works for Clowns.

>>20252

Musk works for Clown/NK, I should say.

Q's words, not mine.

>>20270

>it really isn't D vs R anyway, right?

Exactly. I wish more people would get that.

Musk = enemy

>>20337

Bad news if true. Congress says Zuma lost. Praying that's true. OWLS must be defeated.

>>20351

Fucking sauce please.

(Really shouldn't have to be asking that)

>>20399

IOW: "I was just following orders."

Save it for Nuremberg.

>>20476

He capitalized it because it's a proper noun and needs to be capitalized.

>>20503

So?

>>20555

Falcon 9 = Elon Musk = Enemy op

>>20587

The article was published fucking yesterday, asshole.

Sit back down and shut the fuck up.

Good info needs to be shared.

You contribute nothing but distraction.

[Filtered] shill.

>>20594

Don't really care what you're sure of or not. I know what Q said. That's enough for me.

>>20616

If POTUS is talking about Oprah then WE should be talking about Oprah.

There is nothing wrong with asking questions unless you are afraid of being exposed.