Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 8:09 a.m. No.19854179   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4190 >>4231 >>4286 >>4521 >>4584 >>4678 >>4766

Rigged & StoLLen??

 

Mike Howell on Warroom talking

Killary

Haiti

Clinton Foundation

and

Loretta Lynch Tarmac meeting

 

Check this Steve quote going to break:

"for not doing this properly the first timeyou havent killed the vampire with Hillary ClintonI mean just because we defeat her in 16doesn't mean the Clinton operation and the Vampire is not still there. They're all over ukraine"

 

next segment Howell "got some documents out of the Office of Special Counsel…this ==relates to the infamous tarmac meeting"

 

"what did they ofter Lynch in return? It looks like a supreme court seat.

 

https://gettr.com/streaming/p2tvvara22e

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 8:27 a.m. No.19854231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4241 >>4246 >>4286 >>4521 >>4678 >>4766

>>19854179

>Rigged & StoLLen??

>>19854190

fresh Tarmac

 

> https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/11/01/docs-reveal-fbi-questioned-obama-doj-in-hillary-email-probe/

 

 

Docs Reveal FBI Questioned Obama DOJ in Hillary Email Probe

 

Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH / November 01, 2023

 

A presidential candidate faces an FBI probe surrounding alleged mishandling of classified information, amid questions about the independence of the Justice Department. Meanwhile, the candidate’s supporters allege political interference and demand that the chief investigator be investigated.

 

Such was the case in the closing days of the 2016 presidential election.

 

Democrats and other supporters of Hillary Clinton complained that then-FBI Director James Comey violated the law in notifying Congress that he had restarted an investigation of Clinton’s use of a private, unsecure email server while she was secretary of state.

 

Meanwhile, FBI officials questioned the independence of then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and considered asking for a special counsel to investigate Clinton’s private email server, according to a heavily redacted transcript of an interview with a top FBI career official.

 

Trisha Anderson, then a deputy assistant FBI director, told Office of Special Counsel investigators that “public perception would be that the attorney general herself was not maintaining an appropriate degree of independence.”

 

Anderson expressed her concern after Lynch, the top Justice Department official during the Obama administration, met with former President Bill Clinton while the investigation of his wife, the Democrats’ nominee for president, was ongoing.

 

Anderson also told investigators that FBI officials discussed at various points “whether the [FBI] director should or should not make a recommendation to the attorney general” to appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate the Clinton email case.

 

These are among facts gleaned from a heavily redacted 2017 transcript of an interview conducted by the Office of Special Counsel. That independent agency was investigating whether Comey had violated the Hatch Act, the law that prohibits federal employees from engaging in political activity on government time or with government resources.

 

The 74-page transcript was obtained by The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project through the Freedom of Information Act. (The Daily Signal is the news outlet of The Heritage Foundation.)

 

The interview and overall OSC investigation underscore differences in how the FBI’s Clinton email probe, including the vulnerability of classified information, was conducted compared to the FBI’s probe of former President Donald Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified information.

 

For one, the Office of Special Counsel almost immediately responded to a complaint by beginning an investigation into Comey as FBI director over the accusations of a politicized FBI. However, the office terminated its probe of Comey after Trump fired him in May 2017, since it investigates only federal employees.

 

A report by the Justice Department’s own Office of Inspector General on the Russian collusion allegations against Trump wasn’t completed until 2019. A subsequent report by special counsel John Durham into the origins of those Trump-Russia allegations and the investigations that followed wasn’t completed until earlier this year—two years after Trump left office.

 

Both reports criticized the FBI for procedural abuses amid a lack of evidence that Trump or his associates did anything wrong.

 

“The only people to ever hold Hillary Clinton accountable for anything are the American voters, who rejected her bid for president,” Mike Howell, director of Heritage’s Oversight Project, told The Daily Signal. “It’s seven years after the infamous tarmac meeting where her husband leaned on the then attorney general, and the government is still redacting information.”

 

Howell was referring to Clinton’s meeting with Lynch onboard an airliner at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June 2016.

 

The Daily Signal sought comment from the Justice Department on what Anderson, the FBI official, told the Office of Special Counsel about concerns that the Justice Department was protecting the Clintons.

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 8:28 a.m. No.19854241   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4246 >>4286 >>4521 >>4678 >>4766

>>19854231

>fresh Tarmac

>Docs Reveal FBI Questioned Obama DOJ in Hillary Email Probe

>Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH / November 01, 2023

 

“Thank you for reaching out to us,” a spokesperson emailed. “We will decline to comment.”

 

The Office of Special Counsel, or OSC, should not be confused with any agency of the Justice Department or with the special counsels appointed by the Justice Department to investigate either Trump or President Joe Biden.

 

The OSC, considered an independent investigative agency, operates with basic authorities specified in four federal statutes: the Civil Service Reform Act, the Whistleblower Protection Act, the Hatch Act, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. Provisions of these laws prohibit federal employees from devoting government time and resources to advancing partisan politics.

 

Two lawyers from the office, Erica Hamrick and Ana Galindo-Marrone, conducted the May 1, 2017, interview with Anderson, the deputy assistant FBI director, who was under oath.

 

At one point, Hamrick asked: “Was the appointment of a special counsel [to investigate Clinton] ever discussed?”

 

“Yes, it was. We were asked to consider,” Anderson replied. “I mean, there were numerous congressional letters that were asking for the appointment of a special counsel.”

 

Anderson said she didn’t “have a great memory exactly what was discussed” regarding potential appointment of a special counsel to look into the actions of the former first lady, U.S. senator from New York, and secretary of state, who became the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate.

 

“I just remember that we did talk about it at various points in time of whether the [FBI] director should or should not make a recommendation to the attorney general,” the FBI official said.

 

Documents provided to Heritage’s Oversight Project under the Freedom of Information Act redacted Anderson’s name but included her title. However, the FBI posted Anderson’s interview online as part of a larger release of documents.

 

Anderson answered, “I don’t remember” when asked whether anyone at the FBI was in favor of calling for a special prosecutor to independently investigate Clinton’s unsecure email traffic.

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 8:30 a.m. No.19854246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4286 >>4521 >>4678 >>4766

>>19854231

 

>>19854241

>>fresh Tarmac

 

>>Docs Reveal

 

She answered, “I don’t recall” when asked the reasons for not recommending a special prosecutor.

 

Anderson talked about numerous meetings with high-level Justice Department staff to discuss the FBI investigation of Clinton. She said there was considerable concern about whether Lynch, who oversaw the FBI as attorney general, could be independent during the Clinton probe.

 

The focus of the Office of Special Counsel’s brief investigation of Comey was a letter dated Oct. 28, 2016, in which the FBI director informed House and Senate committee chairmen that the FBI had reopened its Clinton email investigation just days before the election pitting Trump against Clinton. (As it turned out, the FBI quickly closed the case again.)

 

Other OSC questions targeted Comey’s July 2016 press conference in which he announced that the FBI would not recommend criminal charges against Clinton for conducting government work as secretary of state on a private email server.

 

Anderson said in the interview that “there were a lot of concerns” about the FBI’s not making an announcement and simply providing its recommendation to the Justice Department.

 

“It was really clear, especially in the weeks leading up to the [Comey] statement, that at least the public perception would be that the attorney general herself was not maintaining an appropriate degree of independence with respect to the decision making in this investigation,” the FBI official told the OSC lawyers. “And I’m referring to, I mean, I think there were concerns even preceding this, but [in particular] the incident that was extensively reported in the media involving the attorney general’s meeting with former President Clinton on the airplane tarmac.”

 

This seems consistent with Comey’s testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee in June 2017, after Trump fired him the previous month. The former FBI director testified that Lynch, as attorney general, seemed to try to interfere with the probe of the Democratic nominee by pushing a political line.

 

“At one point, the attorney general had directed me not to call it an ‘investigation,’ but instead to call it a ‘matter,’ which confused me and concerned me,” Comey told the Senate panel. “But that was one of the bricks in the load that led me to conclude I have to step away from the department to close this case credibly.”

 

In her interview, Anderson asserted that the Justice Department is “run much more heavily by political appointees,” while the “FBI by tradition, just by virtue of the composition of our executive core, is much more apolitical and independent.”

 

She said most FBI staff didn’t know how much Lynch was briefed on as attorney general regarding the FBI’s investigation of Clinton.

 

“The failure to hold Clinton accountable paved the way for the Biden family corruption scheme, which is essentially a unsophisticated version of the Clinton Global Foundation,” Howell, of Heritage’s Oversight Project, told The Daily Signal.

 

“Failing to hold Hillary Clinton accountable for Jake Sullivan and her campaign’s creation of the Russia hoax led to Jake Sullivan as Biden’s national security adviser, where he has hopscotched the globe leaving disasters in the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and our southern border,” Howell said.

 

“Someone needs to be held accountable for a change, because everyday Americans are living with the consequences,” he said.

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 9:31 a.m. No.19854584   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4622 >>4646 >>4678 >>4766

Kek

Glownigger Debooooonkers and Fact Checkers are losin it with Elon twatting out rigged and stollen election facts.

Garret Archer is such a homo

 

The AZ - abc15 - Data Guru

@Garrett_Archer

19h

Doing the "I'm just asking questions" thing on a video that was not just debunked, but admitted to being a voter by True the Vote is peak Elon.

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

21h

Replying to @elonmusk

Hmm 🧐

 

Nov 2, 2023 · 8:58 PM UTC

The AZ - abc15 - Data Guru

@Garrett_Archer

19h

Nothing provocative about the video. Only those who are intellectually lazy would perceive it as such now.

BrianTerry180

@BrianTerry180

16h

Replying to @Garrett_Archer

You seem troubled

Eric CIAramella’s Dirty Whistle

@TheAndersPaul

18h

Replying to @Garrett_Archer

No one has told me why Fulton County deleted not one but two elections full of drop box videos. Nov 3 2020 and 2022. All but 6 days of absentee video. On all cameras. Some cameras. Zero video. No one seems to have issues with this but me. They also don’t have ballot recap sheets for Nov 3. No Chain of custody logs for 2022. They deleted their signature verification server. They deleted their project packages for dominion. They deleted ballot images for Nov 3 and only kept the recount. The list goes on.

Corey Lambrecht

@OklaInspector

18h

Replying to @Garrett_Archer

Ridiculous that Elon would post a video from Liz Harrington of all people. She’s not biased at all…..

 

We need @PootDibou to set Elon straight on this one.

 

>>19854179

>>19854179

XAnons should retweet the fuck out Elons posts

 

 

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

23h

Judge orders a new election in Connecticut town after surveillance video showed ballot stuffing in drop boxes!

 

That this happened here is beyond reasonable doubt. The only question is how common it is.

Benny Johnson

@bennyjohnson

Nov 2

🚨 Judge Overturns Bridgeport Democrat Mayoral Primary Election, Calling Evidence of Fraud ‘Shocking’

 

“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” Clark wrote in his ruling, adding that the videos “are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.”

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

21h

Hmm 🧐

Liz Harrington

@realLizUSA

11 Apr 2022

THE MOST SECURE ELECTION IN HISTORY

 

Here’s a woman stuffing the ballot box in broad daylight in Gwinnett County, Georgia in the November 2020 Election

 

Nov 2, 2023 · 6:31 PM UTC

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 9:44 a.m. No.19854646   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4652 >>4690 >>4766

>>19854584

Saw this while there:

 

>>19854405

>Way to early for potato to be active

 

>Maine trip not for another hour or so

>>19854361

>Id Potato in Maine already?

 

 

The Maine Wire

@TheMaineWire

1h

Complete location list of all false leads investigated by Maine State Police in the Robert Card manhunt.

 

🧵 1/5

 

> https://nitter.net/TheMaineWire/status/1720456378454602001#m

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 9:55 a.m. No.19854690   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4699 >>4710 >>4766

>>19854646

>Complete location list of all false leads investigated by Maine State Police in the Robert Card manhunt.

Maine State Troopers

pathetic

 

Maine State Police Col William Ross Responds to Questions Regarding Lewiston Shooter Manhunt, Failure of Yellow Flag Law:WGAN

Edward TomicBy Edward TomicNovember 2, 2023Updated:November 2, 20233 Comments9 Mins Read

 

Maine State Police Col. William Ross faced tough questions Thursday morning regarding the manhunt for Lewiston shooter Robert Card during an interview on WGAN Morning News with Matt Gagnon.

 

[RELATED: Maine Gov Calls for “Independent” Commission to Review Police, Army Failures and Botched Investigation Around Robert Card’s Lewiston Murder Spree…]

 

The Maine State Police (MSP) was the agency in charge of the nearly 48-hour search for the shooter, which ended abruptly and surprisingly Friday eveningwhen Card’s body was found less than a mile from where he ditched his car.

 

Since the manhunt concluded, it has faced scrutiny and criticism from both the media and the public,as well as from one Androscoggin County Sheriff’s deputy, who criticized the search operation in a Facebook post.

 

In the since-deleted post, sheriff’s deputyJon Guay called the Command Staff of the MSP “utter clowns,”and said that “Radio Silence” was the best way to describe the amount of information that the MSP shared with the law enforcement officers involved in the manhunt.

 

“I think there’s a lot of frustration out there of what people don’t know, and they don’t know the why, and the how, and all of that,” Col. Ross said when asked about the Facebook post.

 

“Our real issue is, you know, a lot of people have the luxury to have an opinion, and look at us and say ‘but I would have done this differently,’ ‘I would have done that differently’ — but we really have that ultimate responsibility of the decisions that are made with the people that are there on the scene,” Ross explained.

 

Col. Ross added that he does not know the individual behind the Facebook post, and that the MSP’s reaction to the post was more geared towards the media, who he said “really exploited this thing.”

The Manhunt for Robert Card: Why Were K-9 Units Not Used?

 

Turning to the topic of the manhunt itself, WGAN Morning News host Matt Gagnon asked Ross to go into detail about why there appeared to be a substantial delay between the discovery of Card’s abandoned vehicle and a search of the surrounding area.

 

Ross rebutted that there was not a delay, calling it “misinformation.”

 

He explained that immediately after the vehicle was discovered shortly before 10 p.m. on the night of the shooting, “tactical units” approached and cleared the vehicle.

 

Following the discover of the vehicle, Col. Ross explained, a discussion occurred regarding how best to proceed with the search of the area around the boat launch where the vehicle was ditched.

 

This discussion, Ross said, included whether to utilize K-9 units or one of the many “tactical assets” at the MSP’s disposal.

 

While this discussion was occurring, however, Ross said that there was a search underway of the “wooded area” surrounding the vehicle, including a false lead from a helicopter heat signature reading.

 

“The decision was made, and the safest thing to do, is use tactical assets that have specialized training in night movements, specialized equipment to work at night,” Ross said. “These teams, they have better weapon systems, they have better body armor, they have better training, than some of the first responders that are there.”

 

The decision to make use of the tactical assets rather than the other first responders was informed by considering the threat Robert Card posed to the law enforcement involved in the search.

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 9:57 a.m. No.19854699   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4710 >>4766

>>19854690

>>Complete location list of all false leads investigated by Maine State Police in the Robert Card manhunt.

>Maine State Troopers

>pathetic

 

 

Gagnon followed up by asking the MSP Colonel why K-9 units were not used in the search around Card’s vehicle.

 

Ross said that although there were available K-9 units that day, the decision was made not to use them because there was a concern that “the area could be contaminated” due to the number of law enforcement in the area,” as well as that they had tactical assets that were “better prepared” to search the wooded area.

 

Ross explained that using the tactical teams to do a sweep of the area was the “safest thing to do.”

 

“If you didn’t have these tactical teams, we’re going in,” Ross said, adding that the first responders who were at the scene were “ready to go.”

 

“I think a lot of animosity here comes with probably some of these decisions to use these tactical teams,” he said. “We had so many of them, and they’re really the safer option for clearing areas.”

 

“It seemed to work really well,” he added. “I think the downside to it is, some of the patrol officers that were there — and keep in mind there’s hundreds of people that are coming to this scene — weren’t being utilized as much in this capacity.”

 

Ross said that although the decision to use the tactical teams was a “bone of contention,” he believes it was the right decision.

 

“Nobody was hurt doing this, nobody was killed doing this, and I don’t want to be here, sitting here talking about some tragedy that happened because we didn’t deploy an asset that might have been the better choice that we believed to be the better choice,” he said.

 

The Discovery of Robert Card’s Body

 

Gagnon then asked Col. Ross to clarify how the discovery of Card’s body at the Maine Recycling Corporation (MRC) in Lisbon occurred.

 

Law enforcement searched a portion of the MRC premises twice before being called back to the property by the owner to conduct a third search in an overflow parking lot.

 

Ross said that using Card’s vehicle as a starting point for their investigation led them first to investigate the Androscoggin River and the wooded area around the boat launch.

 

According to Ross, the Lisbon Police Department “checked the actual [MRC] building” on Wednesday evening at some point, although he said it was “not a full search” and was not “a tactical team sweep of the area,” and did not include a search of the trailers on the property.

 

As the search operation moved into Thursday morning, Ross said that they considered how to go about searching the industrial park in which MRC is located.

 

Ross said that midday Thursday another group swept the “area of the main [MRC] building,” but did not search the overflow lot across the street.

 

“They weren’t told to do the lot across the street,” Ross said, which prompted Gagnon to ask why not.

Anonymous ID: 2d454b Nov. 3, 2023, 9:59 a.m. No.19854710   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4720 >>4728 >>4766

>>19854690

>>19854699

>Gagnon followed up by asking the MSP Colonel why K-9 units were not used in the search around Card’s vehicle.

 

“I think there was a misunderstanding, that is ‘well we’re doing Maine Recycling, we weren’t told to go across the street and do that,'” Ross responded. “And keep in mind, when we give people specific tasks, you do the specific task, you report back, you say ‘hey, we’ve done a sweep of this area.'”

 

Ross explained that after they learned of the overflow lot from the owner of Maine Recycling, the MSP tactical team began a sweep of the lot around 6 p.m. Friday — which resulted in finding Card’s body in the third trailer they searched.

Why Did Robert Card’s Warning Signs Not Trigger Maine’s Yellow Flag Law?

 

Gagnon then turned to the topic of the warning signs that were present regarding Robert Card in the months preceding the Lewiston shooting, including information shared with Maine law enforcement agencies regarding Card’s mental health issues and his stated intent to commit a mass shooting.

 

“How is it that all those warning signs were present and nothing was ultimately done to protect the community here for this individual?” Gagnon asked Ross.

 

Col. Ross stated that with respect to the information from out of state and from the military that was shared with Maine law enforcement regarding Card — including his two-week stay in a New York psychiatric hospital — “none of that applies.”

 

“It’s kind of a restart when it comes to the state with respect to the weapons restriction law — the yellow flag law — and I think that’s a problem too,” Ross said. “There should have been opportunities here to collect all of this information and be able to move forward with it.”

 

“There isn’t a clearinghouse for this, where this person comes on the radar, and somebody is attached to this saying ‘hey, this person needs to be found, this person needs to be placed and evaluated,” Ross explained. “And when you look at the yellow flag law, there’s a lot of things that have to take place to get to the point where you can remove weapons from the individual’s possession.”

 

The MSP Colonel said that there’s “a lot more work that needs to be done” with respect to the yellow flag law procedure, but that examining those public policy decisions will be under the purview of Gov. Janet Mills’ independent commission of experts.

 

[RELATED: Janet Mills’ Panel on Lewiston Shooting to Include Mental Health Experts…]

 

“I mean, you could have a history in another state, or incidents in another state, and when you come into Maine it kind of resets,” Ross said, to which Gagnon followed up clarifying that Card had made threats against the military base in Saco and that his family had spoken to Maine law enforcement with their concerns about his mental health.

 

“I think when — whoever’s responsible for — whoever inherited this as a case, and that entity needs to track this individual down, and to continue to track this individual down until you locate them and then you can make that assessment as a law enforcement agency,” Ross responded.

 

“And if you can make that determination that they need to be brought in for an evaluation, and you start following the steps of that yellow flag law,” he said. “And I think that’s where things were dropped, that people that had that information –“

 

Gagnon asked Ross if he was referring to the Sagadahoc County Sheriff’s Office, the agency that attempted unsuccessfully to conduct a welfare check on Robert Card in mid-September.

 

“I think that’s where, certainly their file six [missing persons report on Card], that they put out with that information — and I don’t know why that file six was canceled, but I think that this individual needed to be brought in and evaluated,” Ross said.

 

The MSP Colonel added that he was curious about Card’s commitment to the New York psychiatric hospital, and emphasized that “there’s not a lot of people talking to each other,” and that “there really needs to be some type of clearinghouse that’s responsible for these types of things.”

 

Listen to the full WGAN Morning News interview with MSP Col. William Ross below:

 

https://www.themainewire.com/2023/11/maine-state-police-col-william-ross-responds-to-questions-regarding-lewiston-shooter-manhunt-failure-of-yellow-flag-law-wgan/