MSNBC guest: donor class ‘has to go out’ and ‘put a bullet in Donald Trump’
let's see if the FBI goons show up at this clown's door at 4am and murder him with a hail of bullets
https://saraacarter.com/msnbc-guest-donor-class-has-to-go-out-and-put-a-bullet-in-donald-trump/
>If they hurt no one
he hurt all the people who trusted him by betraying their trust
why did he hide his behavior if it wasn't hurting anyone?
and NO ONE killed him
he did that all by himself
shove your triggered snowflake kneejerk hyperactive mommy gene reaction in your bonus hole
no one who can think straight agrees with you or cares about your FEELZ
>It makes him happy.
>Who are the deacons to deprive him of happiness?
it made his parishioners happy to believe he was who he presented himself as to them
who is he to deprive them of their happiness by indulging in what they consider depraved behavior?
KYS kike
>We're free under the US Constitution, whether you believe it yet or not.
we're free by the grace of God
the constitution does NOT grant freedoms
it LIMITS the power of the state to steal them
>Anon does don't endanger other people knowingly
the supreme arrogance of believing YOU know what does or does not endanger others
your own words reveal your hypocrisy
>that is what the Constitution really means
wrong
the constitution exists for one purpose only
to LIMIT the power of the gov't
i agree with most of what you said
except you had to try to drag the constitution into it
why?
if your ideas are valid, you don't need the "authority" of the constitution to support them
>Where did Jesus ever say
do you have every word Jesus ever uttered on record somewhere?
then what was recorded or reported, third hand, is IRRELEVANT, since it's a fragment taken out of context
>one must have responsibility to have true and authentic freedom
that's all you had to say
it stands on it's own
don't muddy the waters
stay on point
>slave master
yer an illiterate retard
look at the lives of common laborers before HF and after HF
he IMPROVED the lot of the common laborer by 1000%
how does that make him slave master?
he freed them from slave labor by paying them MORE than a bare subsistence wage
and giving them at least the opportunity to make more of themselves
if they were wise enough to save and invest in themselves
incomplete misleading and therefore false graphic
>I just wished to make my position clear.
>I am leaving now.
you said you were leaving now
never knew a woman who could keep her word or her mouth shut
>They would sell the mortgage
>And tell me after the fact
sry, but that WAS IN the contract you signed
you COULD have found a different lender
or you COULD have demanded the stipulation that the mortgage could not be sold or transferred
others are not responsible for your ignorance
Russia must protect Zelensky - The Ukrainian leader’s erratic behavior and growing messiah complex means he’s now an asset to Moscow
American elites have realized that as long as Zelensky is in power in Ukraine, Western support will either be burned for one man's ambitions or simply plundered - both to Russia's advantage…The Ukrainian leader’s erratic behavior and growing messiah complex means he’s now an asset to Moscow…The US will not be able to quickly create a political project to replace Zelensky: paradoxically, since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, its control over internal Ukrainian processes has diminished and is now reduced to control over Zelensky, who, it seems, cannot be controlled…In fact, he is uncontrollable…There are two options left: either to persuade Zelensky to leave amicably by pointing to Washington's chosen successor, or simply to kill him: a dead hero is better than a living psycho…Of course, all this is to our advantage: the longer Zelensky remains in power, the longer Ukraine will continue to fight, bringing its collapse closer…Therefore, we should take care of Zelensky, and protect him as best we can
Supreme Court sets showdown over agency power for January
The justices accepted a second case testing so-called Chevron deference, a doctrine that gives federal agencies broad power to interpret their own authority.
The Supreme Court indicated Friday that it plans to grapple in January with a critical question about the power of federal government agencies to interpret their own legal authority.
The justices had already agreed to hear one case this term challenging a legal doctrine, known as Chevron deference, that gives federal agencies substantial latitude to decide what power Congress gave them. On Friday, the high court added a second case on that issue to its docket and signaled that both will be argued in January.
The court provided no explanation for adding the case, Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, to be argued alongside the previously accepted one, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. However, the move appeared to be intended to allow the court’s newest member, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, to weigh in on the issue.
While Jackson was serving on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals last year, she heard arguments in the Loper case, but days later she was confirmed to the Supreme Court and never ruled on the dispute. Still, she recused herself from the case when it reached the Supreme Court.
Both cases involve challenges to the power of federal fisheries regulators to require fishing boat operators to pay for monitors to conduct on-board checks for compliance with federally imposed limits. The Department of Commerce interpreted federal law to give its regulators the power to enact such a requirement, and the agency says that, under Chevron, courts should not second-guess that interpretation. Fishing companies argue that the agency has overstepped its authority.
In recent decades, eliminating Chevron deference has become a cause célèbre for conservative legal activists, who view the doctrine as aggrandizing federal bureaucrats over the judges who typically decide the meaning of federal statutes. Backers of the doctrine say agencies have the special expertise necessary to understand the application of highly technical laws in heavily regulated industries.
The outcome of the cases has the potential to substantially curtail the power of federal agencies in a wide range of areas like the environment, prescription drugs, food safety, auto safety, banking and the financial markets. The near gridlock in Congress also means efforts to shore up agencies’ legal authority are unlikely to be successful.
The high court has considered several cases over the past few years that provided opportunities to overturn the precedent set back in 1984 in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council but has always wound up resolving those disputes without definitively overruling their earlier decision.
The court did not set an exact date Friday for the pair of cases to be argued, but indicated they will be heard during the first so-called sitting, which will occur on a smattering of dates between Jan. 8 and 17.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/13/supreme-court-chevron-defense-case-00121535
yer mom/sister