>>1986301

>>1986318

Investigators, not prosecutors. Investigation aspect of the cases is the key to criminal cases, takes massive time and energy.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

Turley said President Trump should be very happy that Sessions chose this route of appointing Huber, who has the power to seek indictments and prosecute cases, and teamed him up with Horowitz, who has 470 investigators at his disposal, if the president wants to see swift and decisive action.

>>1986304

No. SCOTUS doesn't have that kind, or any, investigative powers. DOJ / IG does.

>>1986336

They are sealed and pending. When an indictment is unsealed, it's removed from that category in the court stats.

>>1986342

Investigator and AUSA are separate and distinct positions. Investigators can be attorneys, but being a USA or AUSA is a specialized position, different skill set.

>>1986365

Actually, typical annual total nationwide is ~ 1,000.

http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/sealed-cases.pdf

>>1986399

The sealed indictments are the result of the investigative process. Gets more streamlined as moves through the criminal case process.

>>1986407

Does NOT equal # of DOJ attorneys working the cases. The 313 AUSAs Sessions is adding are not investigators.

>>1986558

The list is being updated regularly. Current totals are taken from actual court records. Those court records reflect any removals, due to unsealing, and additions of new sealed matters. Therefore, the list shows only what's actually sealed.

You're not understanding the process.