>>1985862 (pb) per the questions by "q" on the article in Business Insider
I found it didn't make sense; sounded like they were making fun of democrats. Maybe the site was hacked. kek
Then they gaslight:
"There is a temptation to mimic his supporters' worst instincts and let go of your own grip on reality."
Than some really bad advise on how to defeat Trump:
"The way you beat an incompetent demagogue is through normal politics, explaining how bad he is at everything, "
Then some Name calling / pontification blend:
"Conspiracy politics is fun but stupid and self-defeating"
following up with Nit- picking:
"Maxine Waters didn't say that. And if she had, she would have said "undocumented immigrant.""
I couldnt' follow what the author was doing with the 13, 14, 15 and I'm actually into that number magic stuff sometimes. I think the writer was trying to fake it (not knowing what she was doing) with a straight face, Irony? Pulling an RR? shuck and jive.
It boiled down to being confusing and unclear who she was attacking.
I'm thinking: That's all they've got? Bottom of the barrel stuff. Also, per "Q"'s question the article did not appear particularly angry.
Maybe they figured out anger is losing the contest for them and so they've toned it down? Now, the flavor represented seemed to me to be close to exhaustion. Maintaining a high level of anger over too much time, can do that? Emotional exhaustion?
I need to still look at the archived pages. I might have missed something but I didn't get the feeling of fear. I got the feeling the writer was given this assignment and was doing the best job she could do, within a very bad parameter, (reality that is), for what she needed to do - and was winging it.