Anonymous ID: ef648e Nov. 5, 2023, 12:58 p.m. No.19866368   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6381 >>6382

>>19866355

they remove things of no value.

and also: your statement is incorrect.

filtering doesn't take away what they give as content.

you're just doing that 'nothing you do is good enough' psyop and you want us to eat the garbage of shills.

someone who posts porn or swears at anon in a turret's syndrome like way, or suggests depravity, or tells others to kill themselves, that one is not worth hearing. they are possessed of evil intent and channelling abuse.

they add nothing. Filtering them is like cleaning the dog-poop off the side walk.

Anonymous ID: ef648e Nov. 5, 2023, 1:31 p.m. No.19866545   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19866434

last night there were tons of the crew supporting that creep.

BO wanted evidence that some of the bakers were not courteous. I posted some choice screen caps where that one was spouting out it's common method of constant derogative insults.

 

they even have a cute name for it.

 

They have to know that it always seems to correlate with the porn/CP/gore that gets spammed.

BO was showing himself to be a mocker of the anon by denying that he knew about the problem. Then after the screen shots he couldn't deny it anymore.

my point was: they have rules to delete people who use the very words that animebaker uses.

I showed the dough, I showed it's creepy posts, and I showed it using words that get others deleted.

 

but never the less the crew was demanding more evidence, and justifying the disgusting tirade of animebaker saying 'post the other side of the conversation.'

I went to bed.

I checked when I woke up and they had gone into their typical adhominum attack against me.

 

They are a sick bunch.

BO looses credibility by playing micky-the dunce in relationship to that crew of mockers and scoffers.