>>19868416 lb
>>19868457 lb
>>19868751 lb
"concern" does not mean anything "concerned" about ever happens.
Some Pharma shill was sure out of their mind, threatening the board for reporting about the safety of Ivermectin.
I wonder why?
Eurgenicist murderers really have people convinced Ivermectin is more dangerous than their experimental untested injections?
Already "proof in the pudding" with all cause death rates up, and much other irrefutable data (dropping dead on field, perfectly healthy before the injection, athletes, etc.)
(Why does Miles Mathis attack DOWD, because of his name and alleged family connects?)
anyway Dowd is reputable source for number crunching.
And he reports the massive death, proved by statistics, from the forced "encouraged strongly" injection (you will lose your job and be refused medical treatment, blocked from entering shops and restaurants, child refused school - if you refuse to submit. Many people desired to decline, but took it for their job security)
So now the crooks are on the line for murder.
So they send their crazy shill here to threaten the board for reporting on a true remedy to their ridiculous murderous nonsense?
wow.
If they argument was so strong why would they censor discussion and threaten to take down the board over it?
No reported deaths from overdoes of Ivermectin over 40 year period when it was used by millions.
That's pretty good evidence of safety.
Did the fake news print evidence for people dying from Ivermectin?
In any case the Social Media platforms banned any discussion of it. Only their side (Pharma Eugenics side) presented;
Doesn't that put them on the line for murder charges and to be sued by those damaged?
Is that why the insane shill showed up here?
If the establishment side has so much evidence of truth to back up their claims, why censor the other side of the argument?
They claim it saves lives?
Projection / inversion; because it's our argument which saves lives and saves our Country; "by the book" Propaganda.
Exact mirroring / projection.
Exactly how does the truth kill people, rather than save them?
Can the MassMedia prove they saved lives?
Is that those culpable push "Let bygones be bygones" "Lets all be friends now"
If their side held up, why would they do that?
There's always two sides (at least) and if one side is blocked, with made-up fake reasons, the ones doing the blocking, sort of lose by default - since the cover-up proves the crime.