Hussein was never a legitimate president. This is probably why he is currently off of our continent, right?
Military Intelligence and the NSA have gathered every speck of evidence necessary to convict Hussein, et al. through properly conducted Military Tribunals.
Why Military Tribunals rather than the (sometimes) corrupt U.S. Court system? Because the sometimes corrupt U.S. Court system is full of judges whom Hussein, the Illegitimate President, appointed. Therefore, those judges are illegitimate, too.
Moreover, here's an applicable quote from The Constitutional Rights Foundation:
http:// www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/military-tribunals.html :
Supporters of military tribunals cite their necessity under the circumstances. They fear that trying terrorists in open U.S. courts could compromise intelligence gathering by forcing the government to disclose its sources. They also fear that regular criminal trials would be tempting targets for further terrorist actions putting the lives of judges, jurors, and witnesses at risk. They argue that traditional due process standards, such as unanimous jury verdicts, would make the conviction of terrorists difficult, if not impossible, because traditional evidence such as informer and eyewitness testimony is so rare in such cases. Finally, they worry that big terrorist trials could turn into media circuses, such as the O.J. Simpson case and others, which would erode the image of America and its anti-terrorist cause around the world.