>>19887100 (lb)
Here's what anon thinks, and anon picks the candidate that most aligns with anon:
-
The border is a multi-pronged mission. Humanitarian and also to raise awareness to the public as to the dangers of unchecked immigration. Those impacted by US operations, globally, are owed reparations. We also need to secure the border to weed out terrorists.
-We'll be more "free" when government shrinks and provides for the needs of the people. If her plan doesn't do those two things, we disagree.
-If she's not pro-choice to a point, then she's out of touch with autonomy and a person's right to choose.
-I don't watch debates because they are just shows for politics nerds that like to see "gotchas" back and forth.
Wrap your head around this, and get back to anon when you have managed to produce an original thought instead of cheer-leading for a warmongering neocon. Also, this template works for every candidate regardless of party or the shape of their private parts.