>>19891887 pb

no mention of how it was faked?

Just set as pure news in the Notables

Where's the sauce for orbit of Moon '68?

I call BS/

It's just mass media say-so

I thought anons were more mature?

Excerpt Greg Carlwood with Jim Fetzer; "On the Moon"

https://tora3.com/video/c48ea1ba320c18e9d6437fce64baf64f

>>19892019 pb

Bannon should appeal

j6 tapes and info on the "commission" j6 are poised to be released with new House Control

We'll see if the evidence knocks a hole in the Mainstream "know-it-all" attitude?

I like the Kamanokazi barging in from Japan.

Even brings tears.

Yes, the people stand together.

I think that was kewl. keke

>>19892704

does he have the pedo smirk.

need more photos.

got zero gravitas and improper demeanor

A lot of the crooked Judges have zero proper judicial demeanor.

He won this office, running unopposed.

So not properly vetted.

?

Also zero self -awareness.

But the main thing is he's 100% crooked and working under new "Equity" -style which is NWO.

He'd give a pass to a pedo, for sure.

Can't find the pedo smirk.

He's too open, in his face.

Pedo smirk is more discrete and self-satisfied.

He's more a show-off.

Not ruling out that he's pedo;

he strikes me as "into" S & M

that also won't rule out pedo, not at all.

What about his wife?

>>19892782

strikes me as a submissive.

same "look" as Woody Allen, also pedo

?

Nerdy, Ugly.

>>19892788

thanks

>>19892800

woody doesn't display the open face, like engoron.

ENGORON , like engorged.

what a name?

central casting?

>>19892802

I support Stone and Bannon.

lack trust for Flynn, but am open-minded.

And it's not about the New Age prayer or the call for one religion.

It's more that he worked for Barry in the Middle East and told everyone to accept the fake election - maybe that helped in the long run from being accused a traitor; He's already been througha lot

There's quite a number of people who appear to be "on our side"

but change when the rubber hits the pavement,

I fail to really blame them.

The real top crooks are the most important.

Many won't go as far as we do in discussing real crime by "our government"

For instance the simualations, "Terror events" which are staged.

Those need to be revealed.

Top enemy is the "FAKE NEWS" mass media

Easiest way to expose them is to expose the simulations?

Or wouldn't that be?

All these 3 were tempted by crooked Prosecutors to testify against Trump (lie to save themselves) and none of them did it.

I have tremendous respect for what they went through.

Also Paul Manafort, He didn't crack either. And he was put through massive unfair testing and imprisonment. His book is good. Very intelligent man. Seems like he wrote his own book? Or not.

If not he picked a good ghost writer.

These Prosecutors and "Justice depts" who are persecuting people unrighteously (like the Roman Inquisitions of old) areOUT OF CONTROLand apparently have beenFOR YEARS

Without collusion of the information networks they'd be out of business by noon today.

keke

>>19892920

back at ya.

>>19893064

false

It's called drowning out everyone else.

It's like shouting down what you need to block

It's what the mainstream does

All the fake "I'm being censored" should learn to screen shot important posts and then re-post, if deleted.

Obviously the contant whining, attacks against the board, constant schreecking - is also part of then technique.

WE SEE YOU

True is you post something good, then get into hate-jew emotions / screeds - then everything else you wrote might not get into the archive.

BUT PEOPLE WILL STILL SEE YOUR MATERIAL WHEN YOU FIRST WRITE IT

IF ITS SO IMPORTNAT SCREEN SHOT

wHY NON OF THE COMPLAINERS DO THAT?

Because their stuff is crap and if they screen shot and reposted, everyone would see it.

It's best if "muh deletions" are unknowns?

The drowning out of important info is a known technique of Propaganda.

Anons here already see it.

When something sensitive comes up, that needs to be supressed, you find the gore fages, the cp fags etc. descend on the site and try to shut it down.

>>19893140

"Those who shout the loudest"

right?

>>19893178

happened to me once.

I learned a hard lesson.

Work I did took a long time and went down the memory hole.

But I side with the BO for several reasons:

1. SAVED THE BOARD from oss

2. WORKS VERY HARD

3. THERE's A POVERTY OF BAKERS

so he can't insult his bakers.

That being said

If it's an important exchange

Or importnat work

SCREEN SHOT IT

or save the whole bread.

"JOE BIDEN WAS IN TO STEAL…"

by deBlasio's daughter.

>>19893226

"Joe Biden was able to steal…"

listen again.