Ah, that time once again.
How many screenshots of aftershave were taken?
It's going to be an awesome day today, don't know why, just feels like an amazing day today for some reason.
Has Ainsley gained weight? Her face looks puffy.
I guess he doesn't know how many screenshots. You'd think a paid retard like him would have tried to see if there was a pattern in there.
>>19892716
Only I didn't die, did I? You're clinging to that. Why? Do you think you're presenting evidence of me not being me? I see no (You)s beside those Anonymous names in the screencaps of MY yes MY posts because I was the one that wrote those and pressed the reply button.
>>19892725
You have to be narcissistic to be a narcissist. Referring to one's self in the 1st person, as opposed to the 3rd person "As an anon, this Anon" LARP you expect, is not narcissistic, it's completely normal in conversation. If you're trying to control how the conversation is had then you'd probably start whining and freaking out. You're a failure. Now giggle to yourself that you got me to reply to you, that I took your bait, while I giggle harder knowing all your evil attempts are falling flat and I get a chewtoy.
Oh no. The shill retard that likes to use every regular named meme I do and even copy the filenames has filtered me. Guess the tard won't be able to copy me then.
> Uncuts can gather together and schnoodle all they want.
Dammit, Jim. You made me spit coffee out on the keyboard and monitor. TOP KEK!
>Anons have been complaining about the censorship.
Shills have been complaining about the censorship. It's their posts being removed.
Wouldn't be surprised if it's VaticanTard. He's the one that usually whines all day about downstream bloggers.
It's not often I see something that hits me in the feels. Rare in fact. So, I better share it with every Anon here and then go for a lunt.
How about showing the other combined 25 posts between those two that you're not showing. It's a known fact the shills will mix in something innocuous so they can hold up screenshots and whine, "Woe is me. I am so persecuted for my posts being removed."
No, you're shilling for free speech without consequences. There's a difference.
Walk into a crowded movie theater and shout, "FIRE!" or "He has a gun!" and then see what kind of consequences can arise from abusing free speech, you goddamn simpleton.
Oh, you want an example of how free speech is being abused here? Okay. Imagine spamming bullshit all day to drown out everyone else. Imagine spamming all day to deliberately distract and divide. Free speech is free, but so are the consequences for not exercising free speech responsibly – it's not a get out of jail free card for your mouth. The consequences are their spam is being removed, and the best thing they can do is whine about it.
Who is crying for speech bans? I only see shills whining that their spam is being removed, and calling Anons shills for not dog-piling on attacking BO and the BVs, like it seems they're hoping Anons would.
Point out the concern, dipshit.
Round and round we go.
You're complaining about Anons thanking the baker now? You can whine harder, I know you can.
I'm seriously still laughing my ass off over the whining about thanking the baker. That spam of thanking someone. Giving thanks makes them squirm.
I SAID WHINE HARDER, YOU PAID TO POST RETARD!
Considered that. Not likely. They like to be the problem that they announce they're fixing. Spam spam spam, show enthusiasm and say, "I can remove that spam, just give me a BV spot and I'll make it disappear." They get the staff spot and the spam stops. Then after the dust settles the spam starts appearing in notables. Every Anon here in the last half of 2021 saw that happen.
It's their birthday today? Huh. How 'bout that. Good day today indeed.
Never did like the way he organized the screen RAM on the Apple II. Fucked with my head as a wee lad cutting my teeth on the 6502.