https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12732397/Viewing-figures-Republican-debate-drop-NBC.html
Viewship continues to drop. The people already know who they are going to vote for.
The poster boy for DUH!
I don't even have to filter anymore.
My brain automatically skips the background noise and only focuses on the few crumbs that matter.
The outfit that pays some of the shills here is wasting their money. Real anons won't be swayed and the media assholes who try to make us out to be something we are not will write such fiction anyway.
The unpaid shills are just sad and pathetic. Not accomplishing anything of substance.
>>19893998
Notables don't matter.
The criteria for inclusion in the notables used to be a nomination and at least a second from anons. Now notables are whatever the baker or note taker want to include. No consistency, no objective vetting criteria. I generally ignore the notables unless something big is habbening and I want to back trace the source of the info.
Otherwise, not worth arguing about.
Frankly, it would be a lot easier for bakers if most of the so-called notables went away. One vote here to see reinstitution of the forgotten procedure of at least a nomination (no self noms) and a second before even being considered for the list. If nothing gets nominated and seconded on a particular bread, so be it. Easier bake.