Q+ & Q

Could POTUS45 state reasons as to why the no jury allowed?

One being jury nullification;

Jury annulment, also known as jury nullification, refers to the power of a jury to ignore or refuse to apply a law in a particular case, despite the evidence and instructions provided by the judge. It occurs when a jury acquits a defendant, even though the evidence may suggest guilt, because they believe that applying the law in that specific case would lead to an unjust result or would be unfair.

In American legal terms, jury annulment can occur when jurors believe that the law itself is unjust, overly harsh, or not suitable for the particular circumstances of the case. For example, if a jury believes that a defendant charged with drug possession was only using drugs for medical purposes, and they disagree with the strict law that criminalizes drug possession, they may choose to acquit the defendant.

Jury annulment is controversial because it allows citizens, acting as jurors, to effectively change or challenge the application of laws passed by legislators. It is seen as a way for the people to have a say in the legal process and prevent the enforcement of unjust laws.

However, jury annulment is not a guaranteed or widely accepted defense strategy. Judges and attorneys often discourage jurors from considering their power of annulment and often do not inform them of this option during trial proceedings. Additionally, some jurisdictions restrict or prohibit attorneys from presenting arguments related to jury nullification.

Overall, jury annulment refers to the ability of jurors to disregard the law and deliver a verdict based on their own sense of justice, often because they believe the law itself is unjust.