>>1989919 (lb)
Yep.
>telling the truth is divisive
Legitimate criticism of jewish subversion and stating facts about the reality of jewish supremacism being at the center of the problems that are threatning the West is not divisive.
I suggest you read this book so you understand what I mean:
“When Victims Rule. A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America”
This is a 2000 page book written by an anon over 18 years ago, featuring over 10,000 citations from about 4,000 (scholarly and mainstream media) bibliographic sources.
http://holywar.org/jewishtr/wvr.htm
http://archive.is/uHFnj
"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance – that principal is contempt prior to investigation."
–Herbert Spencer
>Some quotes from the book:
“Is the profoundly disproportionate social, cultural, economic, and political influence upon America and the western world by a small, largely ethnocentric, international minority group healthy for democracy? And is it healthy, ultimately, for the minority itself? ”
"Modern Jewish identity has become a collective aggression, a collective demand, a collective accusation, a collective insistence upon continued, never-ending reparation and further power. As the old saying goes, there are two sides to every story – but the non-Jewish side of history (in its interaction with Jews) is afforded absolutely no forum anywhere in popular culture."
"In the long term, endlessly one-sided “victim” assaults upon alleged oppressors are not healthy solutions to interethnic tensions. True resolvement, true health, is a dialogue, an exchange, and exploration of mutual prejudices (and the reasons for them), and a willingness to be drawn to sympathy for the others’ side – not merely consistent concession to one group’s accusation and demand."
"There are plenty of people of Jewish descent who do not support Israel, who are not wealthy slumlords, who are not racist, and who exhibit in all spheres the solidest of moral character. But where are they when the Collective Jewish Body speaks, acts, and oppresses in their name? If the Jewish community dictates a “community of fate” by bloodline, surely all those of even partial Jewish heritage have a stake in raising critical voices against the steamroller that claims them."
“The origin of this volume rests simply in a question posed about the state of Israel: "How can such an anti-democratic, ethnocentric, racist, and morally bankrupt socio-political system (Zionism) be so grossly misrepresented as a noble endeavor throughout modern America?" Originally conceived as a traditional book, and a scholarly one, it was soon clear that no publisher would ever be willing to produce so frank an investigation about it's subject matter. Above and beyond all other people, Jews, in western society, have been popularly configured to be beyond the pale of public criticism. And this censorship is zealously, militantly, enforced.”
“The title of this book is When Victims Rule. A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America. This refers to the popular notion that the Jewish people are historical victims, and victims only (never oppressors, never exploiters), always persecuted, and always scapegoats for irrational prejudice. People of Jewish heritage are irrefutably pre-eminent, and often dominant, in many crucial areas of American popular culture. The second part of the title refers to the paradoxical fact that Jews in America are quite the opposite of victims: this project explores the enormous Jewish representation in positions of power and influence in American (and western) society, which serves towards codifying Jewish and Zionist legend as fact. This investigation, analyzing traditional religious – and secular Zionist –Jewish identities, illustrates why this should be of serious concern to all Americans, including Jews. Continued denial of the facts of history by the Jewish community serves no one's best interest – in the LONG term, least of all their own. The facts of history cannot be denied, and dissimulated, forever. (Note: Israel Shahak, Israel Shamir, Alfred Lilienthal, John Sack, Norman Finkelstein, and a few others of Jewish heritage are among the scholarly inspirations for this project. These men's courageously honest works are trailblazers away from institutionalized Jewish hypocrisy. If they represented the norm in the Jewish community, there would be no reason to write this book).”
Do you consider this graph nazi? If so, why?
Are you implying jews are not jews if they are criminals?
Jesus got killed by jews for wanting to end Usury.
>Also:
The Liberal Catholics of our country are now making another concession to Interfaith charity and Brotherhood benevolence. They are saying, "It was not the Jews who crucified Christ; it was the Romans."
I should like to ask these Liberal Catholics a few pointed questions on the subject of Our Lord's death.
Was it the Romans who came out to seize Him in the Garden of Olives with swords and clubs on the night of His Passion, and who brought Him bound to the High Priest, and then to Pontius Pilate, demanding that He should be killed?
Was it a Roman who betrayed Jesus with a kiss, and was it to Romans He was sold for thirty pieces of silver?
Was the High Priest a Roman, who rent his garments and accused Our Lord of blasphemy when He declared Himself to be the Eternal Son of God?
Was it a Roman crowd which stood before the tribunal of Pontius Pilate and shouted: "If this man were not a malefactor we would not have handed Him over to you … His blood be upon us and upon our children!"
Was it the Romans who disowned Jesus as the King of the Jews, and did not want the inscription placed over His head on the Cross when He hung, crowned with thorns, and with nails in His hands and His feet?
Was it God's judgement in Heaven that the Romans had killed Christ, and was that why the Power of the Almighty some thirty years later razed the Temple of Jerusalem to the ground, and left not one stone upon a stone, and has never allowed it to be rebuilt from that day to this?
In the prayers of the Mass for Good Friday of Holy Week, the priest refers to the "perfidious Jews" as the ones who betrayed and crucified Christ. Should he be saying the "perfidious Romans"? And has it been wrong for the Church to put it the first way for as long as her history?
When Our Lord hung upon the Cross, His first recorded words were, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do."
Do the Liberal Catholics really think Our Lord was referring to the Jews when He said, "They know not what they do"? Was it the Jewish Chief Priests, the Scribes, and the Ancients, with whom He sat daily teaching in the Temple and who, when He was crucified, wagged their heads and mocked Him and shouted: "He saved others; himself He cannot save" – was it these who knew not what they did, and whom Our Lord asked the Father to forgive?
Saint Luke tells us clearly that Jesus said this of the Roman soldiers who "dividing his garments, cast lots." And Saint Matthew tells us that these same Romans, after Jesus expired on the Cross, cried out in one voice with their Centurion, "Indeed, this was the Son of God!".
From the book "When Victims Rule":
"There are plenty of people of Jewish descent who do not support Israel, who are not wealthy slumlords, who are not racist, and who exhibit in all spheres the solidest of moral character. But where are they when the Collective Jewish Body speaks, acts, and oppresses in their name? If the Jewish community dictates a “community of fate” by bloodline, surely all those of even partial Jewish heritage have a stake in raising critical voices against the steamroller that claims them."
—-
The patriotic jews need to call for the removal of every jewish interest group in the West, because those are used by the globalist Cabal to subvert.
I do not agree with genocide until all peaceful options have been depleted.
Patriotic jews really need to call for the removal of all jewish interest groups in the West, because the globalist Cabal uses those to subvert and then everyone blames all the jews. Only the jews can save themselves from the backlash this whole mess is going to brew against them.
There needs to be a open and honest discussion regarding the subversive actions perpetrated by jewish interest groups in the West if we are going to fix things peacefully.
Only the jews can save the jews from the backlash this whole mess has brewed against them.
Pointing to jewish/zionist-supremacism is not an appeal to punish all the jews.
It's about defanging jewish nepotistic and subversive inclinations.
White people, Black people, Asian people, all the peoples have the right to self determination, independent of jews.
Jews as a group have repeatedly and continually subversed all nations that kindly host them, and in a way they operate like narcissistic sociopaths against all those that refuse to be controlled by them.
They are hurting themselves and going against their own interests because one day, people will get fed up of trying to fix these issues peacefully and being constantly being silenced, harassed and destroyed (even killed, like legendary patriot General George S. Patton) left and right just for stating FACTS and trying to stand up for their own interests and RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION.
Ok.
So tell me what your opinion on this post is pls: >>1990449
—-
Kek, you are hilarious. It's true, and verifiable, so thanks so admitting defeat :)
If people want to learn more about the history of jewish hatred for Christians, read this:
http://holywar.org/jewishtr/03jech.htm
http://archive.is/frIcU
Jews and Christianity - [about 6 paper pages] Brief history of Christian-Jewish relations; a contextual view of anti-Jewish religious persecution; Jewish-inspired atrocities against Christians in the early years of the Christ movement; traditional Jewish defamation of Christianity.
That is child abuse.
Leads for what, people who state fully sourced verifiable facts?
It is the Brock bots and Hasbara kike shills from JDIF that operate from the US that will get some RICO for sedition action on their asses.
>I can tell you it has some major errors about israel related stuff
Provide proof please.
>That's all there is to this word.
Sayanim is the name of a program of Mossad colaborators who live outside Israel, and many are non-Israelis. This is verifiable.
>Nothing super special about it other than the very high prestige of the program and the high quality service it's alumni get to do in the army (lead project etc).
And you don't see nothing wrong with Israeli soldiers getting spread around the world to lead every major tech company? What do you think about double-citizen politicians?
Kek, he who speaks the truth fears nothing.
Nice concernfagging attempt thou. 10/10 for the effort :)
I love it :D