>"If you spill a drop of American blood, we will spill a gallon of yours." -POTUS
Former President Trump gave a stark warning to enemies of ISRAEL while speaking at the Republican Jewish Coalition Conference on Saturday.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4281495-trump-warns-us-enemies/
…
it is what it is
>>>19903719
>
>Epoch's Roman would be a better vp candidate than Tucker, change my mind
Epoch Times is run and owned by a Chinese New Age religious Cult (Falun Dafa/Falun Gong) … if you are a Televangelical Christian you might find that problematic …
besides, "Epoch Times" is in itself a silly name, taking in account that 'epoch' more or less means 'times' …
the watched the fox news or other live election broadcasts, that's what they saw and that was the evidence
>Retard, 3:02 am, Situation Room with NSA internet feeds being monitored and recorded. When the Jan. 6 Trial happens and this is presented as exclupatory evidence, because an insurrection can only happen against the duly voted for government.
if there was any "NSA internet feeds", they were obviously provided to the DHS and CISA, who straight away announced that the elections were the safest and most honest ever ..
>he's going to have to pay the toll
drops have something on BURNer phones and MAGA COALition
you are a True Believer
>>>19903847 (You)
>
>He may be a true believer, but he's not wrong about DIA's capabilities.
but the DHS and especially CISA were supposed to secure and monitor the election infrastructure integrity, including cyber and the net … NSA does the bulk surveillance but it does not choose any targets on its own in the USA, it just provides the data for agencies that have authorized access
>DIA is the top dog and they could re-route shit any way they want to block DHS, CISA and any other agency from seeing what Q+ & Team were watching.
why would the DIA sabotage and block DHS and CISA seeing the election steal, even if it could, what good would that do?
Idea that the DIA would hide the election fraud in the USA from the agencies that are tasked to guard against it sounds preposterous and extremely unlikely
Things did not end well for the Trump’s administration’s cybersecurity efforts. After Chris Krebs, the head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), was fired by President Trump for releasing a statement claiming, “the November 3rd election was the most secure in American history,” Krebs immediately went on 60 Minutes and the Late Show with Stephen Colbert to take a victory lap after his agency’s solid performance in monitoring the election.
Donald Trump’s campaign lawyer, Joe diGenova countered with “that guy [Krebs] is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot.” This is but one example of the dangerous messaging that emerged from the White House following the election, contradicting election experts and evidence. President Trump’s legacy on cybersecurity will go down in a miasma of confusion and delay.
https://www.cfr.org/blog/assessing-president-trumps-legacy-cyber-confusion
On Sept. 12, President Trump signed Executive Order 13848, titled “Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.” Reporting in early August suggested that such an order was being drafted, though—as will be discussed below—it appears to have changed in some meaningful ways.
The document opens by finding that foreign persons’ “ability … to interfere in or UNDERMINE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN [U.S.] ELECTIONS
>>>19903877 (You)
>
>>sounds preposterous and extremely unlikely
>
>Any more preposterous or extremely unlikely as Joe Biden getting 81 million votes organically without ever leaving his basement?
yes. both Trump and Biden got tens of millions more votes than the amount of people attending their rallies … that doesn't prove anything