UK: First High Court case
Landmark legal case
Oxford AstraZeneca Covid jab was ‘defective’
8th November 2023
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/08/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-jab-defective-claims-legal-case/
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1832962/Oxford-AstraZeneca-covid-vaccine-legal-efficiency
Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine has been branded “defective”
Claims efficacy, vastly overstated
High Court test case
Mr. Jamie Scott
Bleed on the brain
Suffered a significant permanent brain injury
Now unable to work
Vaccinated, April 2021, blood clot
Claim, Consumer Protection Act 1987,
argues AstraZeneca vaccine “defective” (not as safe as individuals were entitled to expect)
From Mr and Mrs Scott
“We were told by the Government the vaccine was safe and effective but what’s happened to Jamie has been life changing and their vaccine caused that.”
“AstraZeneca cannot continue to ignore the circumstances in which their vaccine has caused devastating injury and loss,”
“Our legal case will seek to hold AstraZeneca to account but we need to build a significant fighting fund to get justice.”
Second claim
Mrs Alpa Tailor (35)
Case brought by her widower
Inquest confirmed vaccine death
Two test cases
Could pave the way for 80 damages claims (£80 million)
Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT)
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
At least 81 deaths in the UK, suspected to be linked to clotting and low platelets
(almost one in five sufferers died)
moar in description.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDWdXXclQvs