>>199579

Plane fag here.

I agree that there is a high percentage of planefag posts that should be vetted in the planefag thread before being posted in research.

To many nothingburgers fills everyone up and diminishes the message when potentially significant planefaggotry is identified.

New planefags that have a "I think this may be something" should post findings to planefags.

If the planefags agree that you're on to something, post it in research.

I am just one anon, not trying to make any rules but there are too many planefag posts in research that are speculative at best.

>>199822

Planefag here.

I keep an open mind to any and all things.

That image HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CHEMTRAIL THEORY.

Those are ballast tanks in a new Boeing 787-10 used for FAA certification testing.

Using this image waters down you research.

Not saying chemtrails aren't real but using this image sends you and others digging in the wrong direction and quite frankly, makes you look retarded.

>>199882

What does this have to do with ballast tanks in a new 787-10?

Nothing.

What does this theory have to do with Q Research?

Nothing.