Anonymous ID: f706f4 Nov. 13, 2023, 9:40 a.m. No.19909560   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19909542

>MTG a crazy

 

Death Shot Profits.

 

Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has boasted about being unvaccinated, owns stock in 3 major vaccine makers

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-boasts-unvaccinated-owns-pfizer-jj-astrazeneca-stock-2021-12

Anonymous ID: f706f4 Nov. 13, 2023, 10:04 a.m. No.19909654   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Agree. This KAYFAB is old.

No one buys the bullshit.

Need a new script.

Or better yet, TRANSPARENCY, UNSEALED INDICTMENTS, and some extra damning RAW VID +++ that will be IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFEND

 

"It's all a charade": Jack Smith busts Trump trying to "hoodwink" judge in new filing

 

Special counsel Jack Smith has called out Donald Trump's legal team for allegedly misleading his office regarding the former president's position on televising the proceedings of his Washington, D.C. election subversion trial.

 

Trump's defense attorneys on Friday submitted a filing to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the trial that is scheduled to begin in March, arguing that the use of television should be employed to illustrate the trial's unfairness.

 

“The prosecution wishes to continue this travesty in darkness. President Trump calls for sunlight,” wrote Trump lawyers John Lauro and Todd Blanche. “Every person in America, and beyond, should have the opportunity to study this case firsthand and watch as, if there is a trial, President Trump exonerates himself of these baseless and politically motivated charges.”

 

“There is a high risk that proceeding behind closed doors under these circumstances would serve to further undermine confidence in the United States justice system, while continuing to prejudice President Trump’s rights,” they added.

 

Lauro over the summer said in a Fox News interview that the "first thing we would ask for is: Let’s have cameras in the courtroom so all Americans can see what’s happening in our criminal justice system. I would hope the Department of Justice would join in that effort so that we take the curtain away and all Americans get to see what’s happening.”

 

As Politico noted, the Friday filing did not mention a decades-long federal court rule that bans the broadcasting of criminal court proceedings. Smith's team of prosecutors did cite the rule, however, in urging Chutkan to reject media outlets' efforts to televise the trial, which they asserted has already garnered significant interest.

 

Politico also reported that Trump may be hoping to use his Washington trial — the first of four criminal prosecutions to be scheduled — to reiterate claims of election fraud, as well as "confirming what many have long viewed as a symbiotic relationship between Trump and the mainstream news media, whose ratings and readership is indisputably boosted by coverage of the polarizing former president." The MAGA legal team claimed that Trump Trump’s attorneys said he prefers TV coverage of the Washington trial in part because it will allow the public to “hear all the evidence regarding an election that President Trump believes was rigged and stolen.”

 

In a November 3 filing submission, Smith's team observed that "Counsel for former President Trump has requested that government counsel convey that he takes no position" in the choice to broadcast the proceedings; however, Trump's Friday filing seemed to be a clear endorsement of news organizations' bid.

 

On Sunday, however, Politico legal affairs reporter Josh Gerstein shared the latest filing from the special counsel, which claimed that Trump's legal team had deceived the prosecution about Trump's position on the television broadcast proposal.

 

"On November 3, 2023, the United States filed an opposition to applications of a coalition of media organizations seeking to record and broadcast the criminal trial of Donald J. Trump," Smith's team wrote. "In advance of that filing, the Government sought the defendant’s position on the applications, and his counsel requested that the Government represent to the Court that he took no position. The Government accurately reported that to the Court. On November 10, however, the defendant reversed course and filed a response in support of the applications. The defendant’s response did not engage with the relevant Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure or cite any applicable caselaw, and instead made false and incendiary claims about the administration of his criminal case, United States v. Trump. The Government requests an opportunity to respond to the defendant’s claims and is prepared to file its proposed reply, which is four pages, immediately upon receiving leave from the Court."

 

"Sooo…Trump tried to hoodwink Special Counsel, but instead gets busted by the DOJ for the lies and gamesmanship," tweeted MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang. "Good lawyers that have good cases don’t play stupid games like Trump’s counsel is doing here."

 

more

https://www.yahoo.com/news/charade-jack-smith-busts-trump-160033799.html

Anonymous ID: f706f4 Nov. 13, 2023, 10:20 a.m. No.19909726   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9749

>>19909706

When do we get some rapid fire drops, showing the real reason people are against all things Epstein Exposure?

 

Seriously getting tired of the never ending saga of finger pointing, stalls and delays

 

R's haven't done SHIT for 3 years.

Empty Promises and Endless Lies.