>>19914628 (lb)
My response was without anger, but a question seriously seeking a genuine response is worthy of a response;
Firstly, your question came across as shilly, but we can always misconstrue without the benefit of over 70% of our usual communication and the rest of your posts are not shilly.
Your assumption that the responses to your question were made in anger shows you to be either a newfag or a shill.
Anons know that autists do not respond in anger, rather take pride in being called faggots or retards and expect the same from fellow autists and anons.
Now, as to a response to the question. I noted the 3 international shamans associated with the j6 "insurrection!, the storming of Parliament in brasil and the situation in Italy, anon forgets exactly what the circumstances were, each were definite psyops to associate Q with the actions.
Was the psyop black hat or white hat?
Obviously, anon has no insider information to say for definite one way or the other, but in anon's considered opinion, on the balance, anon feels it was black hat, but who knows?
Could be part of the plan for all know. We are watching a movie after all.