Anonymous ID: 4f551a Nov. 15, 2023, 1:08 a.m. No.19919384   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9410 >>9460

>>19918917

I have a friend who is currently unemployed.

He has a lot of experience in automotive/truck parts sales types of jobs.

But he has a problem.

He likes to smoke pot everyday.

He has been applying for jobs but they all require a drug test.

He lives in a state where pot is legal, but the jobs he's applying for still require drug testing.

So he remains unemployed.

I don't personally smoke pot. I don't care for it. But I voted that pot be legalized because I felt that it is a person's right to be able to smoke it if they wanted to.

But now my friend has been out of work for nearly a year and I just don't see much hope for him getting any work if he keeps smoking the pot.

 

I wonder if the pot dispensaries require their employees to be drug tested? Maybe I should suggest to him that he apply at one of those places.

Anonymous ID: 4f551a Nov. 15, 2023, 2:21 a.m. No.19919460   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9468

>>19919384

When pot was made legal, why is it still legal for employers to require that their employees can't smoke it on their off time? In their own homes after work?

After prohibition, when liquor became legal again, were employers allowed to demand that their employees couldn't drink even on their off time?

 

It seems to me that these employers have too much control over people's personal lives.

Anonymous ID: 4f551a Nov. 15, 2023, 4:10 a.m. No.19919618   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19919567

>heโ€™s a pretty coherent dude who makes logical sense

Agree.

He could be a double-agent.

But then he is seen with that weirdo Austin Steinbart.

They are all actors.

It's hard to tell whose side they are on when they are all acting.