>>19919874 (lb)
At NO time, in NO place, in NO manner, restrictions are CONTENT BASED RESTRICTIONS.
Generic "porn" restrictions DO NOT SURVIVE The Miller Test; not that "porn restrictions" were ever authorized when the Founders CLEARLY wrote "Freedom of THE PRESS".
The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California.[3] It has three parts:
Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
Whether the work depicts or describes, '''in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions[4] specifically defined by applicable state law,
Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[note 1]
'''The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied.
In practice, pornography showing genitalia and sexual acts is not ipso facto obscene according to the Miller test.[why?] For instance, in 2000, a jury in Provo, Utah, took only a few minutes to clear Larry Peterman, owner of a Movie Buffs video store, in Utah County, Utah. He had been charged with distributing obscene material for renting pornographic videos that were displayed in a screened-off area of the store clearly marked as adults-only. The Utah County region had often boasted of being one of the most socially conservative areas in the United States. However, researchers had shown that guests at the local Marriott Hotel were disproportionately large consumers of pay-per-view pornographic material, accessing far more material than the store was distributing.[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test