Anonymous ID: fae6c5 Nov. 16, 2023, 9:20 a.m. No.19926222   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6264

>>19926201

"Ratings" are fake and they and decided by a democracy of unelected artists.

 

"X rating"

Because the X rating was not trademarked, anybody could apply it to their films, including pornographers, as many began to do in the 1970s. As pornography began to become more popular and more legally and commercially tolerated, pornographers placed an X rating on their films to emphasize the adult content. Some even started using multiple X's (i.e. XX, XXX, etc.) to give the impression that their film contained more graphic sexual content than the simple X rating. In some cases, the X ratings were applied by reviewers or film scholars, e.g. William Rotsler, who wrote "The XXX-rating is for hardcore, the XX-rating is for softcore, and an X-rating is for comparatively cool films."[5] Nothing beyond the simple X rating has ever been officially recognized by the MPAA. Because of the heavy use of the X rating by pornographers, it became associated largely with pornographic films, so that non-pornographic films given an X rating would have fewer theaters willing to book them and fewer venues for advertising. Many newspapers refused to advertise X-rated films. This led to a number of films being released unrated sometimes with a warning that the film contained content for adults only. In response, the MPAA eventually agreed in 1990 to a new NC-17 rating that would be trademarked, and could only be applied by the MPAA itself. By trademarking the rating, the MPAA committed to defending an NC-17 film charged with violating obscenity laws.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_rating

Anonymous ID: fae6c5 Nov. 16, 2023, 9:31 a.m. No.19926270   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19926252

"Comply your way to Freedom"

Act Now!

Limited Time Offer

Hurry, hurry.

 

To learn how even you can become compliance (kosher) certified call:

1-888-JEW-SCAM