>>1994804

Again… Accuse us of being afraid to take flak from shills and "sort" through shitposts. Meanwhile you banned everyone you didn't like, wether they spammed or not. I get that you did a lot of good for all of us, but we needed to cut down on the bans around here and you weren't hearing any of it, dismissing real anons as shills because they were on 'poisoned' subnets. We want to give anons their own choice on what to filter out for themselves, and not keep them 'safe' from posts and ideas we don't like. This is the only platform that allows us this freedom.

>>1994892

Proposal:

Red Stick Project: Q Edition

See: >>>/redstick/

>>1995346

The BVs and I have been discussing the baking issue since then. The option is still open for us to monitor the bread handoffs and call out shills when we see a shill trying to take the dough. We can monitor 24/7. This way we wouldn't have to screw around with tripcodes at all, and keep anonymity with the bakers. The BVs and I will try to be at the ready as often as possible with an eBake if there is a bad handoff. This should work for both parties who were for and against the baker TCs.

What do the rest of you guys think?

>>1995410

Once again. You banned too many legit anons. That needed to stop. No one liked this 'system'.