>>19948627

Are you anon albeit in another timeline yet timelines are converging so Holy Shit! There Anon is!?

How about that DEEP CHURCH DEEP STATE Supreme Court though huh Karens?

SCOTUS is primarily JEWISH, amirite?

Yes! yer a ddep digging patriot! Yes you are! Yes you are!!

BUT BUT! THE ANONS ON THE INTERNETS SAID SAVING ISRAEL FOR LAST THOUGH!!!

Dec 21, 2017 8:31:58 PM EST 416

Anonymous ID: deb9fa No. 143329

SOROS takes orders fromP.

You have no idea how sick and evil these people are.

Fight, fight, fight.

Day of days.

Game over.

Q

Feb 10, 2018 5:46:19 AM EST 714

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 No. 325580

Mess with theBEST, die like the rest.

[2] highly classifiedclownops exposed.

[44] remaining.

Wizards & Warlocks.

Save theBESTfor last.

[P]

Q

May 17, 2018 8:15:27 PM EDT 1413

Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 610b24 No. 1449784

Guardian_P.png

Guardian of thePope.

[Personal]

Q

China, Palestinian Authority form 'strategic partnership' to deepen ties

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAktzRoihKw

China inks ‘strategic partnership’ with Palestinan Authority as it expands Middle East presence

Published 6:58 AM EDT, June 14, 2023

“We are good friends and partners,” Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is head of the ruling Communist Party, told Abbas at the start of their meeting.

“We have always firmly supported the just cause of the Palestinian people to restore their legitimate national rights.”

https://apnews.com/article/china-abbas-palestinian-israel-saudi-dd55f1cc81b53cb00cb1d045bc239566

China Inks 'Strategic Partnership' With Palestinian Authority as It Expands Middle East Presence

June 14, 2023 12:45 PM

"China is willing to strengthen coordination and cooperation with the Palestinian side to promote a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the Palestinian issue as soon as possible," Xi said.

https://www.voanews.com/a/china-inks-strategic-partnership-with-palestinian-authority-as-it-expands-middle-east-presence/7137163.html

China signs ‘strategic partnership’ with Palestinian Authority during Abbas visit

President Xi Jinping tells PA leader Beijing has ‘always firmly supported the just cause of the Palestinian people to restore their legitimate national rights’

By AP 14 June 2023, 3:04 pm

https://www.timesofisrael.com/china-signs-strategic-partnership-with-palestinian-authority-during-abbas-visit/

Xi: China willing to help foster Palestinian peacemaking with Israel

June 14, 2023

"The fundamental solution to the Palestinian issue lies in the establishment of an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital," Xi said, according to Chinese state media.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china-palestinian-authority-establish-strategic-partnership-chinas-xi-2023-06-14/

>>19948710

WATCH AS [THEY] RIP EACH OTHER APART!

Supreme Court’s new ‘Code of Conduct’ is about appearances, not about ethics11 20 2023

On Nov. 13, the US Supreme Court — presumably motivated by bad publicity after the exposure of bribery schemes involving justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch, use of judicial aides to promote justice Sonia Sotomayor’s books, and other unsavory activities — announced what it calls a “Code of Conduct,” and what most media outlets describe as an “ethics code.”

The new code goes off the conduct/ethics rails before finishing its short opening statement, asserting that its purpose is to “dispel” the “misunderstanding” that the justices “regard themselves as unrestricted by any ethics rules,” rather than to actually restrict the justices with any ethics rules.

Because the document — 15 pages, including the opening statement, the “code” itself, and commentary/notes — doesn’t provide for any penalty or punishment whatsoever should a justice violate it, the justices remain as unrestricted after its publication as they clearly regarded themselves before.

Even ignoring the absence of consequences, the code itself is full of lofty and often ambiguous “shoulds” and “should nots” rather than specific and well-defined “shalls” and “shall nots.”

As codes go, this one’s far more Emily Post than Exodus 20. It’s not about what the justices may or may not do, it’s about how the court wants or doesn’t want to look.

Does anyone find this surprising? Letting government agencies regulate themselves always results in government agents (especially those who regard themselves as enjoying tenure for life) leaving themselves room to do whatever they like.

In theory, Congress can impose binding rules on the Supreme Court. Contra justice Samuel Alito (“No provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court — period”), Article III of the U.S. Constitution specifies that the justices hold their seats “during good Behaviour,” and that the court operates in its appellate capacity “under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

In practice, impeaching individual justices seems like the best way of imposing the “good Behaviour” requirement, but that remedy’s only been applied once, and threatened once more, in 240 years. In 1804, justice Samuel Chase was acquitted by the Senate. In 1969, Abe Fortas resigned from the court under impeachment threat.

The “checks and balances” system seems, unsurprisingly, to not work very well. The Supreme Court remains at least potentially on the take … if you’ve got the money to buy the rulings you want.

“Put not thy trust in princes,” the Bible tells us. Under which label I’m inclined to include lifetime political appointees.

https://www.thenewsherald.com/2023/11/20/supreme-courts-new-code-of-conduct-is-about-appearances-not-about-ethics/

The Supreme Court’s new ‘code’ does nothing to enhance ethics

by Trevor Potter, opinion contributor - 11/20/23 7:30 AM ET

On Nov. 13, the Supreme Court of the United States adopted a “Code of Conduct” for the first time in its history. This long overdue move is a clear reaction to growing public outrage stemming from a series of ethics scandals involving the justices, including failures to disclose lavish gifts and travel, special access for wealthy interest groups and potential misuse of judicial resources for personal gain.

As the head of a non-profit that has spent years advocating for Supreme Court ethics reform, I wanted to be happy about this announcement. As a Republican lawyer, I wanted justices appointed by presidents of both political parties to come together on this issue.

Unfortunately, despite its elegant legal prose and signatures from all nine justices, the court’s so-called Code of Conduct is no cause for celebration. Upon anything more than a brief glance, this new document reads alarmingly hollow, failing to bind the justices to any meaningful ethics rules that could restore public trust in the judiciary.

At the outset, the court explicitly states that “for the most part these rules and principles are not new,” despite the obvious need for enhanced rules to close existing ethical loopholes. Moreover, in the place of clear mandates about what the court “must” or “shall” do to protect its integrity, the code is filled with vague phrases and “should” statements that merely represent an inadequate promise of good behavior — a set of guidelines rather than a set of rules.

Most disappointing is the absence of any true method for enforcing the standards the court is pledging to follow. While every other branch of government has a dedicated body responsible for enforcing its respective ethics code, the Supreme Court does not even attempt to create one for itself here. Instead, it continues to rely on a system of self-policing where the justices decide thorny ethical questions on their own, such as when they have a conflict of interest or when they ought to recuse themselves from a case.

In addition, the court’s new code provides no process for investigating ethical violations, no method for interpreting ambiguous principles in complex real-world situations and no consequences for justices who simply refuse to follow the rules.

In short, there is no change from business as usual.

By releasing this weak code of conduct, the Supreme Court is attempting to appease the public without assuming actual accountability. It is avoiding the difficult challenge of real reform and hoping that good headlines will dispel the cloud of distrust that has formed above our highest court.

In the long run, this tactic will not succeed.

According to a recent poll, 75 percent of voters support a binding ethics code for the Supreme Court, including 81 percent of Democrats, 72 percent of Republicans and 69 percent of independents. This bipartisan consensus demonstrates a strong dissatisfaction with the status quo that will not be addressed by a cosmetic cover-up like the code offered by the high court this week. When ethical crises inevitably continue to develop, public demand for reform will surge again and again.

That is why my organization, along with many others, has sent a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts, calling on the court to create rules with an enforcement mechanism and true accountability. I hope the court will listen to this request.

But if the Supreme Court refuses to revise its code voluntarily, there are other ways to seek change. Congress has the constitutional authority to regulate Supreme Court ethics, and it should take action without delay. Importantly, Congress does not need to invent novel solutions and can require the Court follow specific ethics practices that have already proven effective in the executive and legislative branches.

The Supreme Court may usually have the final say on the laws of our country, but when it comes ethics, we must demand more. The highest court in our nation needs to be held to the highest standards.

Trevor Potter is president and founder of the Campaign Legal Center and a Republican former chairman of the Federal Election Commission.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4315171-the-supreme-courts-new-code-does-nothing-to-enhance-ethics/

WHAT DOES SUPREME PANIC LOOK LIKE?!!?!?

NBC Boston

The Supreme Court says it is adopting a code of ethics for the first time

The Supreme Court is adopting its first code of ethics, in the face of sustained criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some… 3 mins ago

NBC News

Supreme Court adopts code of conduct amid ethics scrutiny

The Supreme Court on Monday announced it has adopted a new code of conduct, a move that comes after a series of allegations of ethics lapses. 8 mins ago

USA Today

Supreme Court adopts code of conduct after Clarence Thomas scandal

The announcement comes as the Supreme Court has been heavily criticized for lavish travel Justice Clarence Thomas accepted from GOP donor Harlan Crow. 8 mins ago

North Country Public Radio

The Supreme Court adopts first-ever code of ethics

The U.S. Supreme Court is adopting a code of ethics for its justices amid mounting criticism of gifts and trips from wealthy benefactors to certain… 14 mins ago

The New York Times

Supreme Court Announces Ethics Code for Justices

The decision comes after revelations about undisclosed property deals and gifts have intensified pressure on the court to adopt such a code. 16 mins ago

USNews.com

Supreme Court Releases Ethics Guidelines After Months of Scrutiny

The justices have for months been under fire for their approach to ethics in light of recent reports of undisclosed luxury trips paid for by donors with… 16 mins ago

KIRO 7

Supreme Court adopts code of conduct – KIRO 7 News Seattle

The Supreme Court on Monday announced that it will adhere to a code of conduct for the first time in its history after a series of controversies called into… 20 mins ago

wdrb.com

The Supreme Court says it is adopting a code of ethics for the first time

The new Supreme Court code of conduct agreed to by all nine justices does not appear to impose any significant new requirements on them. 20 mins ago

Washington Post

Supreme Court under pressure issues ethics guidelines specific to justices

The Supreme Court issued a statement of ethics specific to the nine justices after reports of lavish and unreported travel and gifts for some of its… 22 mins ago

NPR

Supreme Court adopts a code of ethics for the first time

The U.S. Supreme Court is adopting a code of ethics for its justices amid mounting criticism of gifts and trips from wealthy benefactors to certain… 23 mins ago

NPR

Supreme Court adopts a code of ethics for the first time

The U.S. Supreme Court is adopting a code of ethics for its justices amid mounting criticism of gifts and trips from wealthy benefactors to certain… 24 mins ago

Wisconsin State Journal

Supreme Court Ethics Code

FILE - The U.S Supreme Court is seen, Nov. 3, 2023, in Washington. The Supreme Court is adopting its first code of ethics, in the face of sustained… 28 mins ago

Forbes

Supreme Court Sets Ethics Code For Justices After String Of Controversies

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday it is adopting an ethics code for its justices, in the wake of criticism after some justices accepted undisclosed… 30 mins ago

Politico

Read the Supreme Court's code of conduct

All nine of the court's current justices endorsed the code, which generally tracks existing rules for lower court judges but includes some special… 34 mins ago

The Wall Street Journal

Supreme Court Issues Code of Conduct After Scandals

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court issued its first-ever code of conduct Monday, following months of scrutiny and criticism regarding ethical standards applying… 34 mins ago

ABC News

Under ethics pressure, Supreme Court announces it's adopting code of conduct

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday announced it's adopting a code of conduct after repeated ethics questions raised over acceptance of travel and gifts. 35 mins ago

Reuters

US Supreme Court announces formal ethics code for justices

WASHINGTON, Nov 13 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday adopted its first formal code of conduct governing the ethical behavior of its nine justices… 39 mins ago

Fox News

Supreme Court adopts modified ethics code after pressure from Hill Dems

The Supreme Court on Monday issued a new "Code of Conduct" following months of heightened scrutiny from Democrats pushing for new ethics laws for the high… 40 mins ago

Politico

Embattled Supreme Court adopts code of conduct

The Supreme Court has adopted a formal ethics code for the first time in its history, bowing to public and congressional critics who demanded such a policy… 41 mins ago

CNN

Supreme Court attempts to address ethics concerns with new code of conduct

The Supreme Court said Monday it is adopting a code of conduct in an attempt to bolster the public's confidence in the court after months of news stories… 45 mins ago

KNWA

>>19948719

ANON BLAMES HAMILTON AND THE "FEDERALISTS" LOYALISTS

You really do not like Wizards and Warlocks and it shows…

Q Threat to Clowns 714

Q !UW.yye1fxo 10 Feb 2018 - 5:46:19 AM

Mess with the best, die like the rest.

[2] highly classified clown ops exposed.

[44] remaining.

Wizards & Warlocks.

Save the best for last.

[P]

Q

Who is Leonard Leo?keywords/names King Maker > Sovereign Military Order ofMalta> Federalist Society > Clarence Thomas > Steven Calabresi > Steve Bannon > Liberty Central > Virginia Thomas > the Catholic Association >

Charles Koch and Rebekah Mercer BH Group > CRC Advisors > The 85 > Concord Fund > United States Commission on International Religious Freedom > National Catholic Prayer Breakfast > Kellyanne Conway >

Judicial Education Project >Virginia Thomas Brent Bozell > Media Research Center > Ralph Reed > Faith and Freedom Coalition > Brooks Brothers, check out that Logo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Leo

John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States.

Nominated as Chief Justice of the United States byPresident George W. Bush, he assumed that office on September 29, 2005.

Trump on Roberts July 5th 2012 "John Roberts arrived inMaltaToday. Maybe we will get lucky and he will stay there."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts

Chief Justice John Roberts Appointed Every Judge on the FISA Court

Is that too much power for one person?

https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/72339/chief-justice-john-roberts-appointed-every-judge-fisa-court

John Roberts appoints judges to more than the fisa courtAug 08 2013

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/john-roberts-appoints-judges-to-more-than-the-fisa-court/

Q DROP #144

What council do the WIZARDS & Warlocks control?

STOP TRYING TO SEE SCOTUS AS SOME MONOLITHIC AGENCY… FOLLOW THE MONEY… FOLLOW THE HIGHER LOYALTY

IT ALMOST ALWAYS LEADS TO THE SAME PLACE… TRUST YOURSELF… SURROUNDED BY TRAITORS… EVIL EVERYWHERE