Did Napoleon lose at Waterloo on purpose so that the British would win…but lose everything as the Rothschilds totally fucked them in the stock market the next day? Did the Rothschilds get Napoleon to lose on purpose? They brought him out of Elba to do that?
>no
>they had a rider on the front lines
we know that part. that's what I was referring to, but was it just a concession or was it part of his plan that the loss was able to destroy england through the rothschilds…or did the rothschilds' actions just accelerate the waterloo loss?
I know the story about Napoleon against the london bankers…I'm just wondering if maybe there was maybe something deeper.