Meet (You) in the downstairs hall, Anon:
>>19961765
>my epic ego
Well said!
Even better. Anons know the difference between cover and concealment.
It's not easy being white, Anon.
Who are China and Russia closed to?
Why are China & Russia communist S/closed?
Can you find an owl / Y there?
Was this to prevent evil from entering?
Was this to protect their children/people?
Many Catholics, Anon? /_
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_by_country#/media/File:Percent_of_Catholics_by_Country%E2%80%93Pew_Research_2011.svg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_by_country
As of early this morning it was a 'smoke screen exercise' misinterpreted by the media:
By the time the footage hit X, a whirlwind of rumors began claiming that the ship was on fire, however, what we are most likely seeing a smokescreen exercise or damage control drill.
We have previously seen black obscurant be used by Type 071 landing ships and other PLAN vessels before, with crews placing smoke canisters on various parts of the vessels. The is opposed to the white obscurant used by naval vessels at sea that we are typically used to seeing during smoke screens.
https://theatlasnews.co/conflict/2023/11/21/pla-type-071-landing-ship-smokescreen-exercise-leads-to-fire-rumors-online/
And the binocular cabinet was locked … Thank you, Second Officer Lightoller. The point bein' made by Mr. Pig was the relevant point, Anon.
Mr. Pig stands 'ead and shoulders above the April current out of Melville Bay!
>>19962204
>11:3
>DONT MAKE ANON SMACK YOU AGAIN!
When you read each Q Post ask yourself who the information is intended for and what is the information intended to accomplish. Among other things Q informed us that not all posts were meant for Anons.
If a Q post reveals information similar to 'Patton has an army in England' or 'The landing will be at Pas-de-Calais' or 'We'll be on the beach on the next new moon', think about both the intended target of the information as well as the information's purpose. With information that reveals strategy, tactics, or deadlines the target of that information is the opposing force and the purpose is military deception.
In the writings of Q this is true of dates and/or hints of dates in particular. For example, 'D5' was a very successful illustration of a feint that caused the opposing force to take an unnecessary action.
"A feint is an offensive action involving contact with the adversary conducted for the purpose of deceiving the adversary as to the location and/or time of the actual main offensive action." (JP 3-13.4 I-9)
The 'D5' feint resulted in the GHWB funeral. The opposing force wasted 'ammunition' (Q#2553). The following objective was achieved:
"Causing the adversary to misallocate personnel, fiscal, and material resources in ways that were advantageous to the friendly force." (JP 3 - 13.4 I-6)
In the writings of Q '11.3' and '11.11.18' are examples of information that conveys multiple possible interpretations. Information like '11.3' and '11.11.18' is consistent with DISO, or Deception in Support of Operations Security. DISO:
"… protects friendly operations, personnel, programs, equipment, and other assets against foreign intelligence and security services (FISS) collection. The intent of a DISO is to create multiple false indicators to confuse or make friendly force intentions harder to interpret by FISS, limiting the ability of FISS to collect accurate intelligence on friendly forces. DISOs are general in nature, they are not specifically targeted against particular adversary military, paramilitary, or VEO decision makers, but are, instead, used to protect friendly operations and forces by obfuscating friendly capabilities, intent, or vulnerabilities. (JP 3-13.4 I-2)
CBTS and /qresearch were used as MILDEC conduits.
"Within MILDEC, conduits are information or intelligence gateways to the deception target. Conduits may be used to control flows of information to a deception target. It is rare that a deceptive message is sent directly to the deception target itself. Most often, deception messages are sent to intelligence collectors (conduits) with the expectation that the deceptive message will systematically make its way to the deception target." (JP 3-13.4 I-4)
Anons who interpreted and amplified 'D5', '11.3','11.11.18', etc. served a specific and positive purpose.
Not every Q post is intended to deceive. The conduit and the information source had to appear authentic and real information was shared along with information similar to the above examples.
Joint Chiefs of Staff Publication JP 3-13.4 explains further if you are interested: https://jfsc.ndu.edu/portals/72/documents/jc2ios/additional_reading/1c3-jp_3-13-4_mildec.pdf
Deception in Support of Operations Security (DISO). DISO is a MILDEC activity that protects friendly operations, personnel, programs, equipment, and other assets against foreign intelligence and security services (FISS) collection. The intent of a DISO is to create multiple false indicators to confuse or make friendly force intentions harder to interpret by FISS, limiting the ability of FISS to collect accurate intelligence on friendly forces. DISOs are general in nature, they are not specifically targeted against particular adversary military, paramilitary, or VEO decision makers, but are, instead, used to protect friendly operations and forces by obfuscating friendly capabilities, intent, or vulnerabilities. JP 3-13.4 https://jfsc.ndu.edu/portals/72/documents/jc2ios/additional_reading/1c3-jp_3-13-4_mildec.pdf
Examples of Deception In Support of Operations (DISO)* in the writings of Q :
*('create multiple false indicators to confuse or make friendly force intentions harder to interpret'), (obfuscating)
11.3 (https://qalerts.net/?q=11.3) 9 post(s) found containing "11.3".
D5 (https://www.newsweek.com/qanon-conspiracy-posts-trump-news-d5-december-5-george-bush-storm-great-1245823) Successful feint. See Q #2553.
2018 will be glorious. (https://qalerts.net/?q=2018+will+be) 13 post(s) found containing "2018 will be glorious".
11.11.18 (https://qalerts.net/?q=11.11) 5 post(s) found containing "11.11".
Aye, Mate. The point bein' made by Mr. Pig was the relevant point, Anon.
I'm the senior agent. It was my responsibility to operate the remote vehicle. But I just don't get these game controller things. Making a car go with my thumb was totally new to me.
Not Q. Additional resource:
The Significance of Deception in Contemporary Information Warfare
the major methods of deception are:
• Presenting data to the adversary that represents the truth as you would want them to perceive it. This is achieved by presenting a tailored subset of ‘real’ data, and/or manipulated data, and/or depriving the foe of any data, and/or disrupting the foe’s data collection, and/or • Setting the context in which the foe interprets that data, and/or
• Producing ‘noise’ in the communication channel so that the foe receives only the data allowed by the deceiver.
Information Warfare and Deception, Informing Science, Volume 9, 2006
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49277989_Information_Warfare_and_Deception
…I conceal my tracks so that none can discern them; I keep silence so that none can hear me.”
Sun Tzu
The Art of War, c. 500 BC
>puff her fish