see also
https://safeblood.ch/en/
here's a screencap for you niggas afraid to click that shit
>Elon musk is 100% a pos.
ffs, listen to him speak. listen to his TED talks.
he's a fucking MORAN.
he couldn't beat a chicken at tic-tac-toe
there's NO FUCKING WAY IN HELL he ever invented anything
he's a DS frontman, maybe barely smart enough to start trying to cover his ass by playing both sides
> crudest of turig tests.
turing was an assho faggot
and the turing test is fake and gay
TOTALLY SUBJECTIVE
so how could it be worth a pile of piss?
ps - half the population would fail a turing test if i was administering it
>When it's set Free.
LOL…
in a previous life, i once told the students in my class,
"if you see a guy dancing, you know one of two things for sure… either he's trying to get laid, or he's a faggot."
derp
met penrose once
he was giving a seminar on this very book
i had not read it
but once he explained his "hypothesis"
i could barely keep from laughing out loud
i pointed out that his argument
which was constructed as a reductio ad absurdum
was fatally flawed, bcs he had introduced a contradiction equivalent to russell's paradox in one of the steps
the contradiction he derived was thus suspect since russell's paradox is itself a contraction
he became very defensive, and huffed about the stage
but his only counter argument was "no it's not"
since the ass-kissing profs around me were giving me the stink eye
for being a grad student who dared to depants the king
i held my tongue, to my eternal regret
ps - while i agree that hard AI is CURRENTLY a fraud
i do NOT agree that a sentient machine is a physical impossibility
in fact, unless research is curtailed, it's an inevitibility, and will be worse than any allegorical sci-fi warning
if penrose's book is the basis for your opinion
READ MOAR
he explained the thesis of the book in a two hour long seminar
that was more than adequate to understand his (flawed) concept
the book was a padded piece of tripe written solely to make quick cash from an illiterate and gullible public
>it is impossible because only God makes souls
1) you cannot know this
2) nor can you know if a "soul" can inhabit a silicon machine, since YOUR physical body is nothing more than a machine built of meat
and in the FIRST place, you ASSUME sentient = soul, which is ANOTHER baseless assumption
since i have an inkling of your bibletardness, i'll wager you don't believe that dogs have souls
and yet they are sentient
so before you waste time with a reply, i've already shot your argument (i use the term VERY loosely) down in flames
>You do know that this asshole said that “the unvaccinated should just remove themselves from society“, don't you!
sorry, i guess he's not PERFECT like you
he's not a biologist
maybe he was taken in initially, like 99% of EVERYONE ELSE
so, you know, GFY
your reading comprehension is exceeded only by your triggeredness
i AGREED with you that AI, at present, is a overhyped scam, and does NOT exist in the sense that ordinary tards imagine
i do NOT agree that it is a physical impossibility
but you're too BUTT HURT to take the time to grasp the distinction
ps - compare the length of your last post to this one, since you think that's relevant
>I do believe
the CORE problem, and the intractable issue that prevents rational discourse
>So it's announced as completed.
by WHOM?
no one that is taken seriously in the computer science world
stop reading scientific american, IJIT
get back to me when you have 2 or 3 advanced degrees
>Dogs, however, don't worship the devil and deny God.
that's what the dogs TOLD you, isn't it?
they prolly don't worship Jesus, either.
"If you take a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. That is the chief difference between men and dogs."
– Mark Twain
when an ijit tells you all you have to do is tell AI to compose a symphony, or paint a picture, or write a novel, and it will do it
just ask them who told beethoven to compose a symphony, or da vinci to paint a picture, or kipling to write a novel?
ask them what did AI do WITHOUT being told to do it
>seeing how you reply to me and to others it is only more than obvious
objects in the mirror are >(You)
you judge a man by one statement and disregard the whole of his life and work
and you call others stupid shill fucktards
shall i pull a few Jesus quotes from the bible for you to judge?
>The set of the true answers is tiny compared to the set of possible false answers?
>would you agree?
>proves there are an excess of crazy feminist Marxist ladies on the internet
not a feminist, not a marxist (except groucho, chico, and harpo), not a lady or even female
but we DO have a dozen or so cats on the farm
and i love every one of them
but to be fair, i do not post about them on the internet, and i do not do smartphones or soc media
>(You)
there's a SPECIAL place in Hell for arrogant asshats that condemn others for not being perfect
Matthew 7:3-5. KJV · And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>What for
first programming language i learned
ah…
the good old days
card punches
tractor feed readouts
nights spent in the basement of the compsci bldg
>Yes, only God makes souls and he put them into every atom.
so… you've been channeling Seth, have you?
or just reading jane roberts?
>Kiev would not go forward with recognizing its former territories as part of Russia.
i DIDN'T assume that
i SPECULATED it was a probability
work on your reading comprehension
you assume i deny God
now how are y'all better than me?
aksing for a fren….
already deleted by ADL BORED VERMIN, so prolly not gonna be in notables
>People are taught to do that so, in the event they get rear ended, they don't get pushed out into traffic.
LOL…
rear ended by WHAT?
a 500 car freight train?
>You might just be retarded.
you might just have a crayon in your brain
>A computer cannot FEEL emotion
there is no possible way for you to know that
>our emotions are directly tied to God
that is your BELIEF, and merely stating does NOT make it a FACT
LEARN THE DIFFERENCE
>So.. you are believing the lies
you have NO FUCKING INKLING what i do or do not believe, you triggered faggot
>because you, unlike me, do not teach others,
sure, pal, except i AM a teacher, and have been for almost 50 yrs… SO WHAT?
>I didn't read what you wrote bc I tried to tell u to save your breath
then how the FUCK do you know what i think, or if i even disagree with you, you pretentious condescending ASSHOLE
>AI is psychopath. Period
there IS NO ai, you fucking retard, it's what i've been saying. just because some media pinhead call something AI doesn't mean that it IS ai
>it also costs people nothing to give a bit of extra space.
BULLSHIT
it costs people behind you their time and their patience
you might be blocking access to the very short left turn only lane, so some poor fuck behind you has to sit thru an entire extra cycle of traffic lights
you might be preventing someone from turning into a business parking lot, bcs the whole line of stopped cars is twice as long as it needs to be
if your warped imagination can conjure scenarios where your car is pushed into traffic, maybe you should try using it to imagine the 101 ways you might be a huge pain in the ass to all the drivers on the road behind you
KYS, you retarded fucking snowflake
>Anyone who learnt to program knows that a computer simply follows the commands given.
prove that you are not a computer following commands given
i'll wait
ditto
imagine the smell
hmmm….
i guess you are
you seem to have all the answers
you claim to know everything
what else could i ask of a God?
>Computers have no feels, they are machines.
YOU are a machine built out of meat
here's a vid of DNA replicating
point to where the feelz are
God gave you a BRAIN intending that you should USE it. if you DENY the fruits of logic and reason in favor of clinging to ancient dogma that was written for illiterate camel jockeys, that is NOT an act of FAITH, but is IN FACT, a denial of faith in God's divine plan.
it is YOU who are the heretics
meditate on THAT, you ignorant luddites
>We can go point by point
what would be the point?
you have a mind like concrete
all mixed up and PERMANENTLY SET
reread
as many times as it takes UNTIL IT SINKS IN
>I know how a computer processes opcodes.
you are BLINDED by what you think you know
and have lost sight of the forest for the trees
step back and TRY to think about the big picture
i know how synapses process signals
what the fuck does that actually prove?
YOU are the one claiming to "KNOW" this or that
my claim is simply that YOU CANNOT KNOW what you think you know
and you confuse BELIEF with FACT
>You decline because you realize you will fail.
exactly
i know it's futile to try to open a locked mind from the outside
doesn't mean you're right or i'm wrong
i means you're a BLOCKHEAD, and that i recognize that fact
>actually no.
actually YES
>The human is qualitatively different from computational machine.
evidence? i mean besides you saying it's so
>And materialists (who claim there is no spirir)
i didn't say that, so don't try to put someone elses words in my mouth, FAGGOT
is that the only way you can "win" your little argument?
even IF true (and i'm NOT debating it), it STILL has no bearing on whether or not it's possible to construct a sentient machine
your PHYSICAL body IS a machine. that is FACT.
so if a "spirit" can inhabit and animate a machine made of meat
WHO ARE YOU to say that a "spirit" could not also inhabit and animate a machine made of silicon?
and ALL of this debate is irrelevant to the question of does SENTIENCE equate to having a soul?
again, that is UNKNOWABLE, by you or me or anyone else on earth
can you wrap your tiny pea brain around the thought that i am NOT claiming to know if machine sentience is possible, i'm stating the FACT that YOU CANNOT KNOW, EITHER
> I consider you evil.
finally…
YOU have revealed yourself
>Your "AI" doesn't create things out of nothing,
it's not MY ai, and ONCE MORE, i AGREE that chatbots ARE NOT real AI, and that true machine sentience has NOT been achieved
however YOU are the one who insists that it will NEVER be possible, and ALL i'm saying is that YOU CANNOT KNOW THAT
>You are the accuser.
did you just accuse me of being an accuser?
LMFAO
you are a POSTER CHILD for ignorance
and living proof that debating bibletards is as pointless as arguing with a tape recording of a talking parrot.
however YOU are the one who insists that it will NEVER be possible, and ALL i'm saying is that YOU CANNOT KNOW THAT
REREAD OVER AND OVER AND OVER UNTIL THE MEANING SINKS IN
>Where did I say that?
it's the ONLY thing i've been saying
and you keep disagreeing with me
so what ARE you saying?
you put word into my mouth
and then disagree with them?
>>19963963
butt out, assbreath
>>19963971
it's fucking nite before thanksgiving
this bread started almost 5 HOURS ago
if it weren't for shitposters
baker would be stuck in kitchen until black friday
so why don't YOU GFY and MYOFB, you retarded shit licking glownigger
>"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools," (Romans 1:22)
sounds like someone professing themself to be wise
are you too logically challenged to see the built in hypocrisy, irony, and recursive stupidity of that statement?
>>19963979
i'm shakin in muh boots
>Your claim was that CPUs would/could have feelings, and that no one would know for sure, and I told you no, they don't.
EXACTLY
and here's a pro tip for ya, SPARKY, you CANNOT KNOW WHETHER OR NOT IT WILL SOMEDAY BE POSSIBLE
thx for agreeing that that is what i was saying all along…
and that you're a pretentious asswipe
>bless your shitposting finger tips
>was watching your… well… drama?
>good job anon! thanksgiving to you patriot!
o7 baker
have a great turkey day
if you're leavin', so am i
>technology is inherently evil
>i know that even tho i do not have the slightest understanding of technology
>i use the blessings of technology to spread my bigotry and ingorance around the globe in milliseconds, but i fail to see the irony
>i put my evil words in other people mouths and then convict them of being evil
if that's what you call holy, you can keep it
imma guess you were the Grand Inquisitor in Spain in a previous life
>Who do you Thank at Thanksgiving?
the spirit of the turkey who died so that i might live, with all the solemnity and reverence i can muster
Jesus must be SOOOO proud of your self-righteous phony-ass piety
GFY and when you're done GFY some more
>Reported for spam. Day shift is here, someone clean up.
who the fuck elected YOU hall monitor
i was trying to help baker wrap up this bread that started FIVE FUCKING HOURS AGO
so maybe MYOFB, you arrogant asshat
i'm not out of arguments
you're incapable of hearing them
but one thing is clear
your hollow bravado betrays your fundamental insecurity,
and your lack of character and dwarfed intellect fuel your neurotic need to have the last word,
which is why you cannot stop yourself from replying, even tho you have no rational argument to put forward.
instead you confuse my contempt for your stubborn ignorance with anger
(i feel pity toward you, not anger).
so by all means, PLS reply to me as many more times as you FEEL the need.
i promise i shant reply because i understand how desperately you crave the last word,
and if that's what it takes to assuage your fragile little ego,
then i can be magnanimous enough to allow you your hollow little victory.
don't let the bed bugs bite
>the AI leader made a technical breakthrough that could 'threaten humanity'.
what's it going to do?
BORE us to death with its banality?
shit is what it is
no less and NO MORE
meanings do not exist outside the 4 inches of space between your ears
>The universe is not sentient of its own
where the fuck do you get off making pretentious pronouncements like that?
PROVE YOU ARE SENTIENT
go ahead
we'll wait