Notable
New terms to quash stereotypes while still calling out the combative subgroups.
While we coined the phrase "not anti-X but pattern matching, so we can called out organized fanatical combatives logically; this phrase does not go far enough and should be used after we have defined the subgroups distinctively. Whether it is anti- :: (Semitic, Black, Muslim, LGBT, and other terms such as Homophobia, Misogyny, and other isolate terms), there is no pre-term to describe such subgroups with clarity; although we do have terms like: (ultra, intra, radical, etc…) they still leave these subgroups vaguely defined.
We need a term to describe:
a. that they are a subset and not a stereotype
b. that they converge around a mindset
c. that they have and use an excuse for their actions
d. that they will take actions that go beyond boundaries
e. that they are will to destroy in order to accomplish their agenda.
As I tried numerous combinations, I kept coming back to "gang of" to describe their sub-grouping and "organized" as in organization, whether explicit or implicit, based upon "fanatical" principles.Thus the post-term:
goofies
gang of organized fanatical indignant extremist saboteurs
and the pre-term to describe an individual
goofi
gangster of organized fanatical indignants.
Examples:
Their is a faction of Migrant-goofies
He is acting like a goofi-progressive
This way we are neither prejudice, discriminatory, biased, nor stereotyping but calling out dangerous subgroups that even the MSM cannot argue by our definition. Pattern matching at this point is not only fair and justified but undeniable.
Feel free to critique and make suggestions to better exemplify a-e.