Notable

 

New terms to quash stereotypes while still calling out

 

the combative subgroups.

 

While we coined the phrase "not anti-X but pattern

 

matching, so we can called out organized fanatical

 

combatives logically; this phrase does not go far

 

enough and should be used after we have defined the

 

subgroups distinctively. Whether it is anti- :: (Semitic,

 

Black, Muslim, LGBT, and other terms such as

 

Homophobia, Misogyny, and other isolate terms), there

 

is no pre-term to describe such subgroups with clarity;

 

although we do have terms like: (ultra, intra, radical,

 

etc…) they still leave these subgroups vaguely defined.

 

We need a term to describe:

 

a. that they are a subset and not a stereotype

 

b. that they converge around a mindset

 

c. that they have and use an excuse for their actions

 

d. that they will take actions that go beyond boundries

 

e. that they are will to destroy in order to accomplish

 

their agenda.

 

As I tried numerous combinations, I kept coming back

 

to "gang of" to describe their sub-grouping and

 

"organized" as in organization, whether explicit or

 

implicit, based upon "fanatical" principles.Thus the

 

post-term:

 

goofies

 

gang of organized fanatical indignant extremist

 

saboteurs

 

and the pre-term to describe an individual

 

goofi

 

gangster of organized fanatical indignants.

 

Examples:

 

Their is a faction of Migrant-goofies

 

He is acting like a goofi-progressive

 

This way we are neither prejudice, discrimminatory,

 

biased, nor stereotyping but calling out dangerous

 

subgroups that even the MSM cannot argue by our

 

definition. Pattern matching at this point is not only fair

 

and justified but undeniable.

 

Feel free to critique and make suggestions to better

 

exemplify a-e.