tyb
no matter the issue
anon is stoned and of no use here.
so anon is doing little chores at base camp.
o7
tyb
no matter the issue
anon is stoned and of no use here.
so anon is doing little chores at base camp.
o7
>>19974555 wasted digits byred text full caps
faggot.
anon is most days first meme, sometimes second. cos got to rest the old noggin.
find your joys anons
when ever possible
above all Walk with God and have the full armour of God on at all times.
o7
kek
am not a bible fag.
but there are some great quotes in there
same as Marcus Aurelius quotes.
Anons can learn and adapt.
Above all, anons soul is not for sale.
So anon will walk with God.
this section from a speech from the b.i.s amongst its own members from 2001. total pdf is 6 pages.
Every Government has been captured long ago including the corporations.
https://www.bis.org/review/r010508a.pdf
The Rt Hon Sir Edward George: International efforts to improve the global
economy
Speech by The Rt Hon Sir Edward George, Governor of the Bank of England, to the Swiss Institute of
International Studies at the University of Zurich, 7 May 2001.
continued in link above.
Among other things on the supply-side, there is a shared emphasis on the need to direct public
spending to developing human resources through education and training, to effective health care, and
affordable social safety nets. There has been a global trend to privatisation through which
governments have increasingly returned essentially commercial activities, in which they have no
necessary comparative advantage, to market disciplines. And there is a common recognition of the
need for reforms in labour and product markets designed to reduce distortions which impede the
efficient allocation of resources.
Now I do not pretend to you, Mr Chairman, that the international policy consensus in favour of macroeconomic stability and supply-side reform is fully articulated, particularly on the supply side; nor do I
claim that it is subscribed to in its detail equally in every IMF member country. But it does represent a
substantial evolution in our collective thinking over the past decade or so towards a much more
common approach to economic management, which serves as a valuable framework within which
countries' performance can be assessed. The snail may have moved slowly but it has in fact travelled
a considerable distance!
But broad agreement on the principles, does not make them any easier to apply in practice. This is
evident from the imbalances which have built up within and between the major industrial countries in
recent years. It is uncertainty as to how those imbalances are likely to be corrected that underlies
much of the current concern about the prospects for the global economy.
The major uncertainty relates to the situation in the United States which has experienced a period of
exceptionally strong economic growth with relatively low inflation until quite recently. Briefly – and no
doubt oversimply – this very strong performance is widely seen as driven largely by exceptional
productivity gains, as the application of new information and communications technologies spread
through the economy. This development promised a higher sustainable rate of growth in the US
economy and higher corporate earnings growth. That expectation contributed to a rapid rise in equity
prices, especially in the "high tech" sectors, which in turn helped stimulate both business investment in
the US and consumer demand causing the private sector to move into financial deficit. It also attracted
massive direct and portfolio investment inflows from abroad which over-financed an increasing current
account deficit in the US and caused the dollar to strengthen against other currencies. By the first half
of last year the US economy was expanding at a rate of over 5%, which even on the most optimistic
view of underlying productivity growth was clearly unsustainable. The pace of demand growth in the
US needed to slowdown – as of course it has.
The big questions now are about the extent of the slowdown and how long it will last. And the reality is
that no one can be confident that they know the answers.