Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 1:23 p.m. No.19975840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5895

>>19975743

notice that I didn't make it sound like that there might be nothing, as you point out.

so thank you for noticing.

as useful doesn't mean 'of no use' given special circumstances, like , for instance, a drought prone place.

 

but generally it seems as though most of those discussing spirituality here today are doing it to slide the breads and waste the time of others here, without respect for the souls of troubled people needing guidance.

Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 1:31 p.m. No.19975880   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19975867

>>19975867

If I were being forced to guess I'd tell them zero because then I can say that they are insane to say that they are, and they can't make me a threat or a villain as I would play it that I really know nothing, so why are they tormenting me.

other than that if I weren't forced, and someone just asked I'd say 'how would I know that, if there are or are not, geeze, what are you going on about.

anyone who starts asking those kinds of questions I wouldn't want to spend too much time with.

"do your own research and get back to me" I'd tell them. Why how many do you say that there are

Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 1:34 p.m. No.19975892   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5906

>>19975884

back in the day the term 'clone' was refering to some johnny come lately person newly arrived who assumed the manners and behaviors of someone else, either a boss or some well known person.

they weren't original, and what might be called a 'copy cat'.

but no one thought that they were a 'replicant' of someone else.

they were just people who felt better following trends.

'clone' was a pejorative in that use.

Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 1:36 p.m. No.19975896   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19975891

The Roman Empire never invaded the Emerald Island.

why not?

One theory as to why not: the locals spooked them, and they felt like it wasn't a good idea to do it.

Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 1:41 p.m. No.19975917   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5942

>>19975895

I will quote what I said:

"

but generally it seems as though most of those discussing spirituality here today are doing it to slide the breads and waste the time of others here, without respect for the souls of troubled people needing guidance.

"

 

did you not see the words 'here today'?

 

I said that because I am rating THIS days breads, not all breads ever or all days.

Today, anon, there are trolls shilling trying to engage people with poison thoughts about spirituality.

Today. This day. They are wasting our time.

Some times people have real questions and others have real answers. They don't attack each other. They try to help.

Is that happening with most of the folks discussing these important topics here today?

a flood of boastful ego pretending to talk to Jesus is what I see a lot of.

and anyone who boasts about that, in my estimation, is probably either making it up or confused as to who they are really talking to.

 

"those who say do not know and those who know do not say " is an oft quoted.

Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 2:06 p.m. No.19976008   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19975987

if you are really as confused as you pretend you ought to go learn the answers to these things for yourself as most do who are what are called 'seekers after truth'

they learn that leading questions are often a tether used to pull someone off into fruitless wastelands of contemplative egoist doubt.

and when those types of questions are posited they see either a seeker after truth, and tell them to figure it out for themselves, or possibly a manipulator who knows that the questions are time wasters, and they post something tritle like 'filtered' and move on with the understanding that the confused seeker after truth is a simulation and there is someone just trying to screw with them, toying with them, who might even post a girl with a great big fish just to make the point that the other got fooled again.

 

go do a dig and see what you can find out and then get back to us with answers to all the questions you posted.

TY in advance.

Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 2:53 p.m. No.19976198   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6204

>>19976193

thought you were talking about Spirit.

see how I deflected you from being an annoying Charliton twit to trunning into the 'badger shill respond when they respond' program.

you're clearly an AI and a timewaster. I said go away and the persona that boasted about scripture did go away . so that worked. and another demon stepped up to replace it.

and look, you took the bait and displayed that your a bot and gave up your high-holy roller bit who was the definitive word of god in your boasts.

see how easy you are to control?

And I don't even want to, it just happens.

Anonymous ID: a0bb34 Nov. 25, 2023, 3:36 p.m. No.19976374   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19976343

wait, what?

Joe Biden is an anon and got a call from President Donald J. Trump, my favorite president? What???

 

oh, I see. you think this is a funny put down on the anon.