'Terrorists?'
you'd better sauce that one.
are you sure it wasn't brainwashed young students who are over zealous in their support for Palestinians?
don't you think that calling overzealous 'Terrorists' is incorrect?
Terrorists blow stuff up and throw people from cruise ships.
these overzealous protestors didn't do that, did they?
and just like that he was deleted . . .
ya, that's not cool
ah, that whole 'trash the bouncers while they are trying to work' that gets one thrown out of the bar.
I don't blame them.
maybe one comment, or two, but continuous posting about them being terrible when they are on the job.
it's like people who trash the police who have to clean up after the drunk crashes into another car.
or police, first responders.
I guess if you spend too much time making accusations like a that one (deleted ) did . . .
plus they can see what he's posted other breads.
ya, I'm not against saying honest things, but what bouncer or cop isn't a bad ass when he needs to be?
the one who trashes the bouncer ends up bounced. I'm not surprised.
'but I was saying useful things earlier in the bread.'
GTFO says the BV and 'delete' I bet it was either flint or dart, I must investigate.
Probably dart (as per the board log)
as much as the people say that 'oh those horrible BV' my observation is that they seem to 'take out the trash' rather consistently (from their point of view).
and usually what they delete is someone I've already filtered.
it is what it is.
when you go to bar and you dislike the bouncers and you know that they've been quick on the bouncing out of those who are truculent jerks, do you then act like a truculent jerk?
I say no.
so the BV bounced a truculent jerk out of the bread. He'll be back.
>>19982099
I don't agree with censorship but it is what it is.
as I said if you smack talk a bouncer the chances are you'll be bounced.
PS: I am neither the BO, a BV, a baker or Admin.
I'm someone who reviews what I see in real time and comments on what is being said.
not about everything, but this 'hate on the workers of the board' bit is OLD and no matter what might have happened, or whatever war-face they put on, they are ON THE JOB and if you trash them, well, we know that they aren't saints but people working.
And when you're in charge of dispensing soup, sometimes it's 'no soup for you!'
it's just the way of the world.
the one who trashes the BV and BO: they expect saintly behavior from people who are tasked with dealing with truculent jerks.
it's easy to understand. So why don't the smack talking jerks get it?
so they get the 'no soup for you' treatment.
that's fully to be expected in the current situation here at 8kun Q Reeee-search.
>>19982130
listen to you changing the subject.
you have no idea about me and the Vax, anon, none.
or my deal with anything other than what you read in my posts this bread.
you need to go back to school and learn how to be persuasive.
you make up stuff not just to be provocative but just to be jerk, and then pretend that it's true.
grow up.
>>19982143
now you're replying to me with nonsense.
screen shots about my ideas on the Vax? how's that?
what are you going on about, 44 post chatty one.
>>19982153
now you're just slandering me.
They delete you, anon, because you pester them and say stuff like 'we leave when censorship stops'.
the rules are clear.
you are a pester, you say stupid stuff, you falsely accuse others of BS.
and you get deleted because you target the badasses who work as BV.
this is an F-n war zon and you act like a prissy little fuss bucket.
and if you post anything useful they don't bother reading all your posts.
they just see your threats and say 'no soup for you'
if you stopped attacking them and boasting about your war against them they wouldn't delete you.
well maybe because the know you by now.
and as far as me and censorship?
how F-in dare you.
>>19982181
now I'm Elon?
wow.
you just make it up as you go along.
As all motion is relative and the moon is in motion relative to the sun, that's actually possible for a space ship orbiting the moon.
It would have to have an orbit that was exactly the length of a lunar cycle (lunar month) but that does vary slightly, as the Earth effects it. but about 28 days. It would be 'lunarsynchronous' satillite that would hang over the equator of the moon. It would have to be at an exact distance, and it's beyond my capabilities to figure out what that distance is. Also it might be impossible as the pull of the Earth would certainly have to be part of the equation depending on how far up from the moon it would need to be.
someone know the height of a lunarsynchronous satellite? Space-orbit fags?
anyone from with access to a Satellite simulator that can simulate lunar orbits?
I'm not the one who got deleted, who you were asking about his posts that were deleted this bread.
if you want to see what he posts that got deleted this bread anything at the top of the bread.
can you open another tab and open this bread in there. His posts earlier in the bread were deleted (and it's logged in the board log)
Even some of the ones that you responded to were also deleted.
I opened a second tab and in one he has (63) posts and in this one he has (19)
so that means that Dart (probably dart) got fed up with his smack talking when he was at 44 posts and said 'delete'.
He doesn't learn.
I have trees that size and if I had a bucket truck to put up lights I'd probably use it take one of them down . . .
don't be a buzz kill, anon. I've already got a wreath and a tree.
I want to take out a few trees so I can grow a garden.
it's not about Christmas.
but when Is ee the squirels and birds and all the wildlife that lives in them, ya, I'd feel somewhat guilty.
But there are plenty of other very large trees (the trees I have are 85 feet tall and are too much for my small yard.
there are smaller ones growing farther back so don't worry, I'm not eradicating them. I live in a part of the world that is a forest and if you don't cut down the trees you end up in a damp space with too much moss and no grass or sunlight.
don't worry, as much as you cut them down, they grow right back.
>>19982340
you said I am Elon, and I'm not.
I kind of took that as almost a complement except for the brainchip thing.
I think that Uriel isn't recognized by name, anon.
https://ourladyofhopegrafton.org/feast-of-saints-michael-gabriel-and-raphael-archangels
the enigma of the Roman Dodecahedra
https://www.documentarytube.com/articles/roman-dodecahedra-the-enigma-resolved/