Must Watch

Big Tech is shifting millions of votes. Robert Epstein Reveals New Software To Catch Real-Time Ephemeral Manipulation

"6 Million Votes Shifted To Joe Biden In 2020": Robert Epstein Reveals New Software To Catch Real-Time Ephemeral Manipulation

10:44

Big News capturing data on Big Tech manipulating voters, go to website and see how many elections, Big Tech have shifted. Google, Microsoft, Yahoo etc, the magnitude of this is a million times the voter fraud locally

Website below monitoring Big Tech in real time, predominantly to the left. Its a $3 million dollar website monitoring 24 hours a day, check it:

Americasdigitalshield.com

New system

https://rumble.com/embed/v3vldpv/?pub=4

WE WILL NOT COMPLY!!!

PDJT: They are trying to scare everyone with a new variant, and to scare and force the people into complying so they can rig elections, lockdowns, vaccines, masks. etc

1:30

https://rumble.com/embed/v3vlst7/?pub=4

>>19986701

Check out the elections Epstein and Company they can prove the stole in 2020 and 2022

Anons check out the website

https://americasdigitalshield.com/

>>19986863

notableDr Epstein wife killed, he was a whistleblower He created the digital tracking on Big tech stealing elections. Video on the board now

>>19986863

Thx for that reminder. He said he suspects the people he was blowing the whistle on killed her

>>19986701

Dr Robert Epstein

Wife of Google Whistleblower Killed In I-15 Crash

A North County woman identified as the wife of the Google whistleblower died following a car crash on the State Route 78 onramp to Interstate 15.

By Melissa Adan • Published December 30, 2019 at 10:10 pm

A North County woman, the wife of the Google whistleblower, has died following a car crash on Interstate 15 on Dec. 23.

Misti Vaughn, 29, was identified by the California Highway Patrol as the deceased driver in a car crash on the morning of Monday, Dec. 23.

Vaughn was driving on the transition ramp from SR 78 to I-15 in the rain when she lost control of her Ford Ranger and spun out, veering to the left and flying across I-15, CHP said. She crashed into a big rig and an SUV, whose drivers stayed at the scene and were not injured.

After transportation to the hospital, she remained in intensive care at Palomar Medical Center in Escondido for several days until her death.

“I spent 4 days with her, never left, never changed clothes,” said husband Dr. Robert Epstein.

Vaughn was married to the Google whistleblower, Dr. Robert Epstein, who testified before Congress against Google in July, sharing how the company reportedly meddled in the 2016 election.

Dr. Epstein said the couple lived in Vista, working at their non-profit, the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology.

“Misti's poetry was what got me to fall in love with her,” Dr. Epstein said. “She had an extraordinary inner depth and beauty you can see through her work.”

He described his wife of nearly seven years as an accomplished poet with exceptional talent and care for the world. He said her poetry has a real edge because of the tragedy she's endured.

“This is a double tragedy for her family because her younger sister Christina, almost four years ago to the day was killed by a hit and run driver,” he said.

Over the weekend Dr. Epstein shared about his loss publicly on twitter.

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/wife-of-google-whistleblower-killed-in-i-15-crash/2236690/

>>19986701

Q proof?

So he was reporting on the 2016 presidential election stealing!

Wife of Google whistleblower who alleged election meddling dies in car crash. Dec 29, 2019

psychology professor Robert Epstein

Tragic Misti Dawn Vaughn, 29, was killed when her Ford Ranger spun into the path of a tractor-trailer in California, her husband Robert Epstein revealed in a heartbreaking Twitter post

The wife of a whistleblower who claimed there was widespread Google meddling in the last US Presidential election has died in a car crash.

Tragic Misti Dawn Vaughn, 29, was killed after her vehicle spun into the path of a tractor-trailer in California.

She was married to psychology professor Robert Epstein, 66, who shared his grief in a heartbreaking Twitter post. Prof Epstein wrote: "My beautiful wife Misti, a published poet, succumbed last night to injuries sustained in a car accident.

California Highway Patrol spokesman Officer Mark Latulippe told the San Diego Union-Tribune that the car spun into the path of a big rig, which was hauling two dump trailers.

Prof Epstein claimed Hillary Clinton picked up more than 2.6 million votes because ofGoogle bias

The Washington Post/Getty Images)

Prof Estein controversially claimed that Google search resultsgave Hillary Clinton an advantage in the 2016 election.

Testifying to Senator Ted Cruz in July, he said theDemocratic candidate benefited from 2.6 million extra votes as a result.

He said: "I know the number of votes that shifted because I have conducted dozens of controlled experiments in the US and other countries that measure precisely how opinions and votes shift when search results favor one candidate, cause, or company."

But Google denied favouritism, saying in a statement: "This researcher's inaccurate claim has been debunked since it was made in 2016. As we stated then, we have never re-ranked or altered search results to manipulate political sentiment.

"Our goal is to always provide people with access to high quality, relevant information for their queries, without regard to political viewpoint."

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/wife-google-whistleblower-who-alleged-21181912

Karine Jean-Pierre: SHE DOESN'T LIKE PETER!!!.

KEK

0:21

https://rumble.com/embed/v3vmmfg/?pub=4

The real villain here is Google.

Google found one of the very best business models of all time, skimming all the surplus profit off of the entire free open internet.

This is the natural end state of that process.

The closure of internet has been driven by this because the only way to make money sustainably is to not leave your shit open on the internet where Google will index it, middleman you, and eventually clone you.

If your content was hard to index (eg video) that would work for a while, but those days are coming to an end. Plus Google bought the world’s second biggest search engine, YouTube, so it’s sort of a moot point anyway.

This could have been averted if Google was less avaricious. Instead of trying to eg. eat Yelp alive with by giving Google reviews an unfair advantage in search, they could have partnered with them and cut them in on the revenue.

The fact revenue sites now optimize to trick you into reading for as long as possible before giving you the recipe is directly due to this phenomenon…more time on site both ranks them higher on Google, and also lets them show more ads, which they need to compete for top spot.

The reason the % of the internet that is globally indexed keeps dropping is because of this.

If Google worked closely with their partners, the sites and people who provide the open content that makes one of the most profitable businesses in the world work…then people like SEO-heist-man would be out of luck. Bc Google would know they were being ripped off.

Look how it works on YouTube. Extensive controls mean you can’t just copy someone else’s videos and rank. If you tried to GPT-steal their YT videos they’d rightly strike you. But Google hasn’t bothered to build that for the open web because it’s just a commons to plunder to them.

Sad. I remember the huge surplus of an open web. Maybe someday we’ll figure out how to get it back.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1729195991457517663.html

This looks like PANIC to me!

Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US

Experts in constitutional law and the military say the Insurrection Act gives presidents tremendous power with few restraints

ByGARY FIELDS Associated Press

November 27, 20231/2

WASHINGTON – Campaigning in Iowa this year, Donald Trump said he was prevented during his presidency from using the military to quell violence in primarily Democratic cities and states.

Calling New York City and Chicago “crime dens,” the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination told his audience, “The next time, I’m not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it and we’re going to show how bad a job they do,” he said. “Well, we did that. We don’t have to wait any longer.”

Trump has not spelled out precisely how he might use the military during a second term, although he and his advisers have suggested they would have wide latitude to call up units. While deploying the military regularly within the country's borders would be a departure from tradition, the former president already has signaled an aggressive agenda if he wins, from mass deportations to travel bans imposed on certain Muslim-majority countries.

A law first crafted in the nation’s infancy would give Trump as commander in chief almost unfettered power to do so, military and legal experts said in a series of interviews.

The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

“The principal constraint on the president’s use of the Insurrection Act is basically political, that presidents don’t want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street,” said Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. “There’s not much really in the law to stay the president’s hand.”

A spokesman for Trump’s campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment about what authority Trump might use to pursue his plans.

Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Nunn said it's an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement.

“It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore,” he said.

It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes.

Trump has spoken openly about his plans should he win the presidency, including using the military at the border and in cities struggling with violent crime. His plans also have included using the military against foreign drug cartels, a view echoed by other Republican primary candidates such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley, the former U.N. ambassador and South Carolina governor.

The threats have raised questions about the meaning of military oaths, presidential power and who Trump could appoint to support his approach.

Trump already has suggested he might bring back retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who served briefly as Trump’s national security adviser and twice pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI during its Russian influence probe before being pardoned by Trump. Flynn suggested in the aftermath of the 2020 election that Trump could seize voting machines and order the military in some states to help rerun the election.

Attempts to invoke the Insurrection Act and use the military for domestic policing would likely elicit pushback from the Pentagon, where the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is Gen. Charles Q. Brown. He was one of the eight members of the Joint Chiefs who signed a memo to military personnel in the aftermath of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The memo emphasized the oaths they took and called the events of that day, which were intended to stop certification of Democrat Joe Biden's victory over Trump, “sedition and insurrection.”

Trump and his party nevertheless retain wide support among those who have served in the military. AP VoteCast, an in-depth survey of more than 94,000 voters nationwide, showed that 59% of U.S. military veterans voted for Trump in the 2020 presidential election. In the 2022 midterms, 57% of military veterans supported Republican candidates.

Presidents have issued a total of 40 proclamations invoking the law, some of those done multiple times for the same crisis, Nunn said. Lyndon Johnson invoked it three times — in Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — in response to the unrest in cities after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968…

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-hints-expanded-role-military-us-legacy-law-105172859

>>19987333

2/2

During the Civil Rights era, Presidents Johnson, John F. Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower used the law to protect activists and students desegregating schools. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state’s governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out.

George H.W. Bush was the last president to use the Insurrection Act, a response to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the white police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King in an incident that was videotaped.

Repeated attempts to invoke the act in a new Trump presidency could put pressure on military leaders, who could face consequences for their actions even if done at the direction of the president.

Michael O’Hanlon, director of research in foreign policy at the Brookings Institution think tank, said the question is whether the military is being imaginative enough with the scenarios it has been presenting to future officers. Ambiguity, especially when force is involved, is not something military personnel are comfortable with, he said.

“There are a lot of institutional checks and balances in our country that are pretty well-developed legally, and it’ll make it hard for a president to just do something randomly out of the blue,” said O’Hanlon, who specializes in U.S. defense strategy and the use of military force. "But Trump is good at developing a semi-logical train of thought that might lead to a place where there’s enough mayhem, there’s enough violence and legal murkiness” to call in the military.

Democratic Rep. Pat Ryan of New York, the first graduate of the U.S. Military Academy to represent the congressional district that includes West Point, said he took the oath three times while he was at the school and additional times during his military career. He said there was extensive classroom focus on an officer’s responsibilities to the Constitution and the people under his or her command.

“They really hammer into us the seriousness of the oath and who it was to, and who it wasn’t to,” he said.

Ryan said he thought it was universally understood, but Jan. 6 “was deeply disturbing and a wakeup call for me.” Several veterans and active-duty military personnel were charged with crimes in connection with the assault.

While those connections were troubling, he said he thinks those who harbor similar sentiments make up a very small percentage of the military.

William Banks, a Syracuse University law professor and expert in national security law, said a military officer is not forced to follow “unlawful orders." That could create a difficult situation for leaders whose units are called on for domestic policing, since they can face charges for taking unlawful actions.

“But there is a big thumb on the scale in favor of the president’s interpretation of whether the order is lawful," Banks said. "You’d have a really big row to hoe and you would have a big fuss inside the military if you chose not to follow a presidential order.”

Nunn, who has suggested steps to restrict the invocation of the law, said military personnel cannot be ordered to break the law.

“Members of the military are legally obliged to disobey an unlawful order. At the same time, that is a lot to ask of the military because they are also obliged to obey orders,” he said. “And the punishment for disobeying an order that turns out to be lawful is your career is over, and you may well be going to jail for a very long time. The stakes for them are extraordinarily high.”