Anonymous ID: 00daf6 July 2, 2018, 10:04 a.m. No.1999463   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9957

>>1999329 lb

Do not doubt that 2-BASG took off from Jeddah. I provide 2 confirmations:

  1. Flew to Jeddah on July 1 per our tracking yesterday (pic)

  2. Flightaware says departed from Jeddah about 3.5 hours ago. (pic)

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/2BASG

 

...Evidence is about as definitive as it gets.

R7

Anonymous ID: 00daf6 July 2, 2018, 10:09 a.m. No.1999506   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9649 >>9730

>>1999430

Deep dream is not always better.

Natural pic on left looks much more trustworthy. Pic on right looks creepy.

I use photo-altering software all the time BUT I am very selective to pick images that convey what I am trying to express in my graphic art. Put the words Trust Huber on the left hand image if you want a good meme.

Anonymous ID: 00daf6 July 2, 2018, 10:30 a.m. No.1999695   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9784

>>1999622

Your thoughts and background are interesting, lawfagprepperanon.

I do not have anything to say on your idea of having more SCOTUS judges. I think the current panel of 9 is OK. A stable court system where everyone knows what to expect, from term to term and generation to generation, is a desirable objective IMO.

 

But I was wondering this morning what the Constitution says about the procedure for appointing and confirming SC justices. I thought only the President can appoint? but the other legislator for SC tweeted that he planned to nominate Gowdy. This raised the question in my mind as to what is the exact constitutionally-prescribed procedure.

 

If writing on that appeals to you, I'm sure many anons, myself included, would appreciate the info rather than having to go read the Constitution ourselves.

Anonymous ID: 00daf6 July 2, 2018, 10:38 a.m. No.1999789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9805

>>1999742

Too bad about Robin Williams. We did not know, until after he suicided, that he had made the usual Hollywood/entertainment industry pact with Satan. Now it's rather apparent that most all of them do. Not possible to become a "star" unless (((they))) want to promote you.

Anonymous ID: 00daf6 July 2, 2018, 10:43 a.m. No.1999834   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9896

>>1999784

Is it reasonable to infer that each of the sealed cases (as opposed to merely warrants) corresponds to one set of factual circumstances with generally multiple defendants who were involved in that alleged criminal conduct? Would that be a way to expedite this huge caseload of cases through the system rather than indicting one defendant at a time and hoping to try them all sequentially using the same facts as had been admitted into evidence in a first case on subsequent defendants' cases?