Anonymous ID: b8593c July 2, 2018, 10:54 a.m. No.1999961   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9975 >>0033 >>0051

>>1999874

>>1999881

>>1999885

>>1999904

>>1999930

 

Fuck all of you half way truth seekers. They are NOT ALL indictments.

 

Q did not confirm they were ALL indictments. It was confirmed there WERE indictments in it.

 

>>1999911

 

Is this lawfag from The Simpsons?

 

Why are you spreading disinfo? Those sealed docs are a combination of indictments, search warrants, subpoenas, etc

 

I've suggested before that the anon keeping that list should change the title and never listens.

Anonymous ID: b8593c July 2, 2018, 10:56 a.m. No.1999990   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0068

>>1999959

Anon, the point is to represent what it is accurately. They are not all indictments.

 

It could involve 1000 people or 400,000 - we dont know.

 

Point is to use accurate language because we are going to come under a lot of scrutiny soon.

Anonymous ID: b8593c July 2, 2018, 11:05 a.m. No.2000150   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2000021

 

Here asshole

 

As you can see in this example, you can even seal testimony.

 

http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/content/sealed-criminal-document-procedures

 

Another example

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_17

Anonymous ID: b8593c July 2, 2018, 11:06 a.m. No.2000176   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2000033

 

You're dim.

 

Q confirmed there were sealed indictments, did not confirm there were 40k sealed indictments.

 

You can invent reality if you want but you're wrong.