yes tx anon i did mean that case law has in many cases FAILED to abide by the constitution
the whole curriculum devolved into an analysis of 9 individual's opinion
that is great if they stick to the letter of the law but they didnt
then congress failed to take back the usurped power
no -i am saying that the constitution should be the foundation of legal teaching NOT the cases interpreting it
the "grey" areas of the law are really not many anon
most are the result of the way lawyers are tguth that results in the parsing and bullshit we all despise
language is that way - no amount of laws or cases will dispel its flaws
here is the example - "this sentence is false"
been going on for a long time (first we kill all the lawyers…)
but it is corruption and must be brought dark to light then only the constitution and common sense will be needed to prevent the loss of life and liberty
so you have been taught or told
its a con
good faith and honest application of the law is the only way - that will happen as the GA sets in and people regain their freedom and are free from duress and coercion of the cabal
lawfag here
i understand your statement
spouseanon says the same
what it points to is a failure of basic education
not your fault but should be EZ as 1 2 3
it will take some time and effort in your part but WWG1WGA so ask for help any time
scotus does anon
you know that
and this is why i promoted the idea of enlarging the court because a larger group is less likely to steer way off course
it took 175 years to deterioarate and willtake time
but the basic framework - our constitution - is sound
as are many early decisions that address your basic questions
we will get there