3 reasons big GOP donors might pick Haley over Trump
BY LIZ PEEK, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 11/30/23 11:30 AM ET
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4335333-3-reasons-big-gop-donors-might-pick-haley-over-trump/
Presidential candidate and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley scored a big endorsement this week, winning the backing of Americans for Prosperity Action (AFP), described as the “largest conservative grassroots coalition in the country.” AFP is led by Charles Koch, has millions of members and is capable of fielding thousands of activists to knock on doors and encourage people to vote.
It was a big win, but it’s not the only reason for optimism inside Haley’s campaign.
Other wealthy GOP donors seeking an alternative to frontrunner Donald Trump, some of whom are discouraged by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s failure to gain traction, are taking a hard look at Haley. JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Home Depot Founder Ken Langone are reportedly in that group; Fund Manager Stanley Druckenmiller and private-equity bigwig Barry Sternlicht have already donated to Haley’s campaign.
Why would business leaders support Haley over Trump? After all, President Trump reduced regulations and lowered taxes during his administration — among the policies most popular with business managers. Plus, the stock market surged while he was in the White House, even with COVID causing a nationwide shutdown.
There are three reasons why wealthy GOP donors might back Nikki Haley: electability; predictability; and durability.
Let’s discuss durability first. Haley has one definite advantage over former President Trump: if she wins, she could occupy the Oval Office for eight years. Because of term limits, Trump could serve for only four.
Many conservatives, including myself, think that President Joe Biden and his Democratic colleagues have so damaged our country that it will take at least eight years to turn it around. Eight years to clean out the corrupt upper ranks of the FBI, to extricate the U.S. from harmful entanglements like the Paris climate agreement, to whittle the federal government down to a sustainable trajectory, to establish permanent barriers to illegal immigration and to remove cumbersome regulations that are slowing down our growth.
If Trump were to choose a running mate able to pick up the baton in 2028, this tenure issue would become less important. But given his penchant for elevating candidates whose main attribute is fealty to Donald Trump, that is not a given.